Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44190 (CHH)

YOGENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/5008/2025 · 2025-09-21

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:48445 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5008 of 2025 1 - Yogendra Kumar S/o Sukhiram, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village - Haranmudi, Tahsil - Pali, P.S.- Pali, District - Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Employment And Training Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director, Skill Development And Enterpreneurship Department, Mantralaya Directorate, Employment Exchange Building, Library Avenue Pusa, New Delhi, Pin- 110012 3 - The Secretary, State Board Of Examination, State Trade Training Council, Chhattisgarh, Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Director, Directorate Of Employment And Training, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Principal, Industrial Training Institute, Pali, District - Korba (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.L. Uikey along with Mr. Ganesh Prasad Prajapati, Advocate For State For Respondent No. 2 : : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, Panel Lawyer Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 22/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following reliefs: “10.1. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the records pertaining to 2 the case from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to issue permanent National Trade Certificate (NTC) in Fitter Course, in favour of petitioner, within stipulated time, in accordance with law. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which may be deemed fit in the given facts and circumstances of the instant case including cost of litigation.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has undergone Fitter Training from the Industrial Training Centre, Pali and appeared in All India Trade Examination 2014. After conducting examination, the respondent no. 3 has issued temporary national trade certificate in favour of petitioner in the year 2014. The petitioner has made several requests and representations before the respondent authorities for issuance of permanent National Trade Certificate (NTC) or State Trade Certificate (STC), but till date the same has not been issued in favour of petitioner and therefore prayed for a direction to respondent no. 2 and 3 to issue permanent National Trade Certificate. 3. Learned counsel for respondents raised no objection in this 3 regard. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the counsels for the respective parties, this Court is of the opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending, therefore, the respondent no. 2 and 3 are directed to immediately process the claim of the petitioner for grant of National Trade Certificate and issue the same to the petitioner subject to verification of documents within an outer limit of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondent no. 2 and 3 for taking necessary steps pursuant to the order passed by this Court. 7. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima