Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44189 (AP)

N. V. Prasanth, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/3264/2014 · 2025-04-27

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 3264 OF 2014 Between: N. V. Prasanth, s/o Late Nekkam Panduranga Rao, Hindu, 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No.11-306, Reading Room Street, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. 2. Madanapalli Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Madanapalle Municipality, Chittoor District. 3. S.Ranganatha Babu, S/o S.Lakshmi Narayana, 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No.15-3-4-B, Reddeppanaidu Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 Of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High / Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2 taking action on the petitioners representations dated 06.01.2014 as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the respondent not to allow the 3 nd respondent in not 2nd rd respondent to proceed with the construction activities on the northern side of the petitioners house bearing D.No. 11-306, Reading Room Street; Madanapalle, Chittoor District. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWVMP. NO: 715 OF 2014) Between: Satrasala Ranganatha Babu, S/o S.Lakshmi Narayana, 45 years, R/o D.N0.15-3-4-B, Reddeppanaidu Colony, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ...Vacate Petitioner/Respondent No.3 AND 1. N. V. Prasanth, s/o Late Nekkam Panduranga Rao, Hindu, 45 years, Occ: Business, R/o D.No. 11-306, Reading Room Street, Madanapalle, Chittoor District. ...Respondent/Writ Petitioner 2. the Madanapalli Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Madanapalle Municipality, Chittoor District. 3. The State of Andhra Pra.desh, Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. ...Respondents/Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstarices stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the exparte interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.4012 of 2014 dt. 14-2-2014 in W.P. No. 3264 of 2014 pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court I.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 4012 OF 2014) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2"^^ respondent to take action on the petitioners representation dated 06.01.2014 by restraining the 3 respondent by proceedings with the constructions. rd Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2? SRI CH VENKATA YADAV Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI S S BHATT The Court made the following: f APHC010128802014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 3264/2014 Between: ...PETITIONER N. V. Prasanth, AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SSBHATT 2.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No. 3264 of 2014 ORDER: 1. In view of the Letter dated 23.04.2025 filed by the learned counsel for Petitioner(s) before the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, permission for withdrawal is accorded. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT R^ISTRAR SECTIONkdFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to SRI MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI S S BHATT, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI CH VENKATA YADAV, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Three CD Copies Sree (gsg) .1 HIGH COURT DATED:28/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.3264 of 2014 § 2 3 SEP 2025 m $Jj s- . Current Section ^ DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS