Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44184 (PNJ)

SUKHWINDER KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/19629/2025 · 2025-05-26

Mahabir Singh Sindhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-19629-2025 131 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-19629-2025(O&M) Date of decision : 26.05.2025 Sukhwinder Kaur …..Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU Present: None for the petitioner. Ms. Manjot Kaur, AAG, Punjab. ****** MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU, J. Present petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying to transfer the investigation of FIR No.11 dated 06.02.2024 (P-1), under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC’), registered at Police Station Meharban, District Ludhiana to any other Police Officer. 2. This Court on 09.04.2025, passed the following order:- “Learned State counsel, on instructions from Inspector Pawandeep Singh, has apprised the Court that investigation is almost complete and final report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is likely to be presented within a period of four weeks, after getting approval from the competent authority. Posted for 26.05.2025. It is clarified that there is no formal notice of motion in this case.” -1- DIWAKER GULATI 2025.05.27 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-19629-2025 3. Today, learned State counsel, on instructions, apprised the Court that after completion of investigation, final report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has already been presented before the Court of competent jurisdiction on 28.04.2025. 4. In view of the above development, no further direction(s) is/are required to be issued in the matter, at this stage. 5. In view of above, present petition is disposed off. 6. It is clarified that above observations be not construed as an expression of opinion on merits of the case in any manner. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. 26.05.2025 (MAHABIR SINGH SINDHU) d.gulati JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned : Yes No Whether Reportable : Yes No -2- DIWAKER GULATI 2025.05.27 16:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document