- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5112 WP No. 101788 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101788 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GOOLAVVA W/O SANGAPPA SHIRUR, AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN-587 206. 2. SHRISHAIL S/O SANGAPPA SHIRUR, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN-587 206. 3. SMT. BASAVVA W/O RAJAKUMAR MURANAL, AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN-587 206. 4. SMT. RESHMA W/O GYANAPPA KOLAPPANAVAR, AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN-587 206. 5. SMT. BHARATI W/O SIDDAPPA KOLAPPANAVAR, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HOOLAGERI, TAL: BADAMI, DIST: BAGALKOT, PIN-587 206. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.C. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5112 WP No. 101788 of 2025 AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, BAGALKOT-587 101. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BAGALKOT DISTRICT BAGALKOT, PIN-587 101. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.S.C.Hiremath., counsel for the petitioners and Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil., HCGP for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs: a) Issue a Writ of Certiorari to quash the impugned Judgment and Award dated 07.04.2022 passed by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Badami in LAC. No.153/2016 vide Annexure-D. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5112 WP No. 101788 of 2025 b) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Reference Court namely the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC., Badami to dispose of LAC. No.153/2016 on merits after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioners to come on record as legal representatives of deceased original claimant. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. The Registry is justified in raising the objection regarding the maintainability of the Writ Petition. The Writ Petition is not maintainable. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as not maintainable. The petitioners may approach the appropriate forum, if so advised. The appropriate forum may consider the time spent by the petitioners before this Court. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE RH/MRP LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 31