Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4418 (AP)

Mungara Bhagvan Sankara Prasad, v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1952/2025 · 2025-07-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010032122025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 1952/2025 Between: 1. MUNGARA BHAGVAN SANKARA PRASAD,, S/O. SRI PRASANNA RAMA LINGESWARA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. FLATNO.304, D.NO.5-2, SRI VARDHANI APARTMENT, 1ST LINE, SRIRAM NAGAR, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARSARAOPETA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE STATION, NARSARAOPETA, PALNADU DISTRICT ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the 2nd and 3rd respondent in not register a crime upon the petitioners complaint dated 07-08-2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register a crime basing on the petitioners complaint dated 07-08-2024 and conduct the investigation and file charge sheet before concern court as procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3rd espondent to forthwith register a crime basing on the petitioner’s complaint dated 07-08-2024, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMESH N Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the 2nd and 3rd respondent in not register a crime upon the petitioners complaint dated 07-08-2024 is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Art.14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to register a crime basing on the petitioners complaint dated 07-08-2024 and conduct the investigation and file charge sheet before concern court as procedure contemplated under the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and pass such……” 2. Sri N.Ramesh, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. To that effect a memo has been filed on 21.07.2025 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.07.2025 MH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 22 WRIT PETITION NO: 1952/2018 Dt.23.07.2025 MH