Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44175 (AP)

Tadipaneni Adilakhmi v. The General Manager,

WP/4788/2014 · 2025-07-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010476482014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI / WRIT PETITION NO: 4788 OF 2014 Between: 1. Tadipaneni Adilakshmi, W/o Sivanarayana, aged about 60 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 2. Tadipaneni Sivanarayananma, W/o Sambasiva Rao, aged about 62 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 3. Pavuluri Padmavathi, W/o Siva Satyanarayana, Aged about 50 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 4. Gottipati Rama Devi, W/o Venkata Rao, Aged about 48 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 5. Amimeni Lakshminarayana, S/o. Nageswara Rao, aged about 48 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 6. Unguturi Seethamahalakshmi, W/o Somaiah, aged about 55 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 7. Chirumamilla Shivaji Babu, S/o Sambasiva Rao, aged about 42 years, R/o Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. 8. Name Srinivas Chowdary, S/o Punna Rao, aged about 49 years, Rio Vinjanampadu village, Vatticherukuru Mandal, Guntur District. / ...Petitioners AND 1- The General Manager, A.P. . Irrigation Development Corporation Maitri Bhavan, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. 2. The Executive Engineer, A.P.S. LD.C., Guntur. 3. The Divisional Engineer, A.P.S.LD.C., Guntur. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated i pleased to issue in the affidavit filed therewith, an order, direction the High Court may be or writ more particularly in the nature of action of the respondent authorities in laying petitioners' lands admeasuring Ac-2-48 cents in Sy. No.647; Ac. 1.23 Sy. No. 647 & 642A/3; Ac. 1.29 cents i Nos. 643-C, 665/B, 665-A1; Sy. No. 392A & 643B/1; Writ of Mandamus declaring the the pipe line diagonally an extent of cents in cents in Sy. No. 641; Ac. 1.83 in Sy. N0.464-A2; Ac.6.50 cents in Sy. Ac.0.75 cents in Sy. No. 643B/2; Ac. 1.77 cents in and Ac.0.95 % cents in Sy. No 82 situated Kornepadu village, Vattlcherukuru Revenue Mandal, Guntur at district without Transparency acquiring the same under the Right in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation proceedings as arbitrary, illegal and against principles of 23.4.1992 passed by the Hon'ble [ «olative Of Article 300A of Constitution of india and consequently to direct the peZ T"""' petitioners without acquiring the same to Fair Compensation and and Resettlement Act, 2013 > null and void. or 'issuing any against norms of public policy natural justice and contrary to the orders dated High Court in WP No. 5314 of 1992 and of the jA NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 in the affidavit filed i direct the CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the petition, the High Court respondent authorities not to lay the pi work of Etukuru Lift Irrigation Scheme across the lands of the petitioners Sy. No.647: Ac. 1.23 may be pleased to pipe line in execution of the on Guntur Channel in Guntur District admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in cents in Sy. No. 641; Ac. 1.83 cents in Sy. No. 647 & 642A/3; Ac. 1.29 cents in Sy. No.464-A2: Ac.6.50 cents in Sy. Nos. 643C, 665/B, 665-A1: Ac.0.75 cents in Sy. No. 643B/2; Ac. 1.77 cents in Sy. No. 392A & 643B/1: and Ac.0.95 14 cents in Sy. No. 82 situated at Kornepadu village, Vatticherukuru Revenue Mandal, Guntur district in pursuance of the Tender Notice No.36/2013-14, dated 2.9.2013, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: V RAJA MANOHAR (SC FOR APSIDC) The Court made the following order; APHC010476482014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0MB [3331] FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 4788/2014 Between: 1.TADIPANENI ADILAKHMI, W/0 SIVANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RIO VINJANAMPADU VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.TADIPANENI SIVANARAYANARNMA, W/0 SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED YEARS, R/0 VINJANAMPADU VILLAGE, ABOUT 62 VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.PAVULURI PADMAVATHI ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/0 VINJANAMPADU VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4.GOTTIPATI RAMA DEVI YEARS, R/0 VINJANAMPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5.AMIMENI LAKSHMINARAYANA,, SA) NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YEAS, R/0 VINJANAMPADU VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6.UNGUTURI SEETHAMAHALAKSHMI,, W/0 SOMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/0 VINJANAMPADU VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7.CHIRUMAMILLA SHIVAJI BABU ABOUT 42 YEARS, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8.NAME SRINIVAS CHOWDARY,, S/O PUNNA RAO, AGED ABOUT 49 W/0 SIVA SATYANARAYANA, AGED VILLAGE, W/0 VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 VILLAGE. VATTICHERUKURU S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED R/0 VINJANAMPADU VILLAGE, YEARS, RIO VINJANAMPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE GENERAL MANAGER, DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, HYDERABAD. A.P. STATE IRRIGATION MAITRI BHAVAN, AMEERPET, 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.S.LD.C., GUNTUR. 3.THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, A.P.S.LD.C., GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or writ more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in laying the pipe line diagonally across the petitioners' lands admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in Sy. No.647: Ac.1.23 cents in Sy. No. 641; Ac.1.83 cents in Sy. No. 647 & 642A/3: Ac. 1.29 cents in Sy. No.464-A2: Ac.6.50 cents in Sy. Nos. 643-C, 665/B, 665-AI; Ac.0.75 cents in Sy. No. 643B/2; Ac.1.77 cents in Sy. No. 392A & 643B/1; and Ac.0.95 1/2 cents in Sy. No. 82 situated at Kornepadu village, Vatticherukuru Revenue Mandal, Guntur district without acquiring the same under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 or 'issuing any proceedings as arbitrary, illegal, null and void, against norms of public policy and against principles of natural justice and contrary to the orders dated , 23.4.1992 passed by the Hon'ble High Court in WP No. 5314 of 1992 and violative of Article 300A of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent authorities irot to lay the pipe line across the lands of the petitioners without acquiring the same and to pass. lA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 5938 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to lay the pipe line in execution of the work of Etukuru Lift Irrigation Scheme on Guntur Channel in Guntur District across the lands of the petitioners admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in Sy. No.647; Ac.1.23 cents in Sy. No. 641; Ac.1.83 cents in Sy. No. 647 & 642A/3: Ac. 1.29 cents in Sy. No.464-A2: Ac.6.50 cents in Sy. Nos. 643C, 665/B, 665-AI: Ac.0.75 cents in Sy. No. 6436/2; Ac. 1.77 cents in Sy. No. 392A & 643B/I and Ac.0.95 V2 cents in Sy. No. 82 situated at Kornepadu village, Vatticherukuru Revenue Mandal, Guntur district in pursuance of the Tender Notice No.36/2013-14, dated 2.9.2013, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.V RAJA MANOHAR (SC FOR APSIDC) The Court made the following order: Sri G. Venkat Sailendra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioners submits that by afflux of time, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the same is rendered as infructuous. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR assistant registrar //TRUE COPY// To, FFICER SECTIO GUDAPATI Advocate [OPUC] MANOHAR (SC FOR APSIDC) Advocate 1- One CC to SRI VENKATESWARA 2. One CC to SRI V RAJA [OPUC] 3. Two CD Copies RAO gsg » , HIGH COURT DATED: 11/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 4788 OF 2014 v-y^\ g{ 18 OCT 2025 ml Co' Sectioit^yy DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS