Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44170 (AP)

SMT.MADDELA FLORENCE ANGEL VIJAYA RANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8540/2023 · 2025-04-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8540 OF 2023 Between: Smt.Maddela Florence Angel Vijaya Rani, W/o G Jayapal, Occ: Secondary Grade Teacher, Aged about 57 Yrs, SPG Model Primary School, Nandyal, Nandyal District, Andhra Pradesh State -518 502. ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Secretary, Dept of Home, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, A. P -522503. 2. District Collector, Nandyal District, Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh - 518502. 3. Superintendent of Police, Nandyal District, Nandyal, Andhra Pradesh - 518502. 4. Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Nandyal, Nandyal District, A. P - 518502. 5. Sri M. Sairam, S/o. Unknown to the Petitioner, The then District Educational Officer, Kurnool Present Deputy Director, Department of School Education, Jawahar Balabhavan, Guntur, Guntur (Dt), A. P - 518004. 6. Sri S. Brahmam, S/o. Unknown to the Petitioner, Age-55 Yrs, Occ: Mandal Education Officer, Noonepalli, Nandyal, Nandyal (Dt), A. P -518 502. 7. The Rt. Rev. E. Pushpa Lalitha, D/o. E. Ratna Swami, Age-65, Occ: Bishop, Bishop's House compound, Bommalasatram, Nandyal, Nandyal (Dt), A. P-518 502. m / 8. Sri K.D.J.R. Kennedy, S/0, K. Luke Prasad, Age-56, Occ: Teacher, B.B.S. Compound, Mission compound, Nandyal Town, Nandyal (Dt), A.P.-518 502. 9. Smt P. Mary Krupavathi, W/o. M. Subbarayudu, Occ; Retd Teacher, R/o. 7*^ Quarter, SPG Compound, Nandyal, Nandyal (Dt), Andhra Pradesh - 518502. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the respondents in filing Charge Sheet in Crime Number. 374 of 2021 U/s 188, 341, 355 r/w 34 IPC on the file of III Town PS, Nandyal, Nandyal District as illegal, arbitrary, biased, unconstitutional, against the prihcipfes of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 207.-^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to file the Charge Sheet in Crime Number. 374 of 2021 U/s 188, 341 PS, Nandyal, Nandyal District.' ■ 355 r/w 34 IPC on the file of III Town Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N VfJAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents No.i 3 & 2: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent N6;2: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI LVSNAGARAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.7:'SR| Y JAYA RAJU The Court made the following:- : " APHC010166892023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY. THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable dr justice VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8540/2023 / Between: Smt Maddela Florence Angel Vijaya Rani AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.N VIJAYA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 GP FOR HOME 2 GP FOR REVENUE 3.YJAYARAJU 4 L VS NAGARAJU ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: OEBEB- The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: "... to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly a Writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in filing Charge Sheet in crime Number 374 of 2021 U/s.188, 341, 355 r/w:34 IPC on the file of III Town PS Nandyal, Nandyal District as illegal, arbitrary, biased, unconstitutional against the principles of natural justice." 2. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and that the relief sought for has become infructuous. 3..Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 2 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGIS^AR //TRUE COPY// / SECTION OI%ICER / To, 1. One CC to SRI N VIJAYA BHASKAR Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra 3. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE [OUT] 4. One CC to SRI L V S NAGARAJU. Advocate 5. One CC to SRI Y JAYA RAJU, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies Pradesh [OUT] High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OPUC] HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.8540 of 2023 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS