PEDDAPALLI VIDYA SAGAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
CRLP/8742/2024 · 2025-04-01
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44169 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44169 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
* ft 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A.NOs.l AND 2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8742 OF 2024 t -• A Between: Peddapalli Vidya Sagar (A1), S/o.Veerachary, aged 36 years, R/o.Flat No.419, Indira Enclave, Ayodhyanagar, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. ...Petitioner/Accused-1. And
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Satyanarayana Puram Police Station, Rep. through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, A.P., At Amaravathi, Guntur District: ...Respondent/Complainant
2. Maharna Chandrasekar, S/o.Late. Narasimha Murthy, aged 60 R/o.Door No.23-18-11, Vyakaranamvari Street, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. years ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No.289 of 2024 on the file
% of the S.N.Puram Police Station, NTR District, dated 05-08-2024 against the ' petitioner herein. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2025 Between: Maharna Chandrasekar, S/o.Late Narasimha Murthy, aged 60 years, R/o.Door No.23-18-11, Vyakaranamvari Street, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. . ...Petitioner/ Respondent/Defacto Complainant ’ AND
1. Peddapalli Vidya Sagar (A1), S/o.Veerachary, aged 36 years, R/o.Flat No.419, Indira Enclave, Ayodhyanagar, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. ... Petitioner/1 Accused AND
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Satyanarayana Puram Police Station, Rep. through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, A.P., Amaravathi, Guntur District., ...Respondent/Complainant Petition filed under Section 320(6) of Cr.P.C/Section 359 (6) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit and compound the offence against the petitioner and, consequently acquit petitioner/AI, by quashing the proceedings in Crime No.289 of 2024 before the S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City, NTR District. l A. NO: 2 OF 2025 / f/ Between: Maharna Chandrasekar, S/o.Late Narasimha Murthy, aged 60 years R/o.Door No.23-18-11, Vyakaranamvari Street, Satyanarayanapuram Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. ... Respondent/Defacto Complainant AND
1. Peddapalli Vidya Sagar (A1), S/o.Veerachary, aged 36 R/o.Flat No.419, Indira Enclave, Ayodhyanagar, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. years ... Petitioner/1 Accused AND -■K
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Satyanarayana Puram Police Station Rep. through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, A.P. Amaravathi, Guntur District.
, ...Complainant/Respondent Petition filed under Section 359 (2) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the compromise by compounding the offence against the Respondent/1 ^‘.Accused and consequently acquit him, by quashing the proceedings in Crime No.289 of 2024 before the S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City, " NTR District against Respondent/1 Accused. St *Joint Compromise Memo enclosed (vide separate sheet)
% I.A. NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition filed under Section 528 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all proceedings against the petitioner herein in connection with FIR No.289 of 2024 on the file of S.N.Puram Police Station, NTR District, dated 05-08-2024 pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Chevuri Rama Swamy, Advocate for Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of Respondent No.1 and of Sri Palaparthi Prabhakar, Advocate for Respondent No.2 The Court made the following:
0: APHC010536782024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8742/2024 Between: Peddapalli Vidya Sagar ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.CHEVURI RAMA SWAMY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): I.Palaparthi Prabhakar 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
2 I.A.Nos.j and 2 of 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION N0.8742 of 2024 COMMON ORDER: The instant petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short BNSS) has been filed by the petitioner/Accused No.1, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in Crime No.289 of 2024 on the file of S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City, for the offences under Sections 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’). I I.A.No.1 of 2025 is filed by petitioner/Accused No.1, seeking to
2. compromise the offences between the parties. I.A.No.2 of 2025 is filed by petitioner/Accused No.1, seeking to quash the proceedings in Crime No. 289 of 2024 on the file of S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City and a joint memo was filed. 3. 4. The petitioner/Accused No.1 and 2 along with 2respondent are present before this Court. The affidavit seeking leave of the Court for quash 289 of 2024 on the file of S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City are perused and joint memo also is perused, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 are allowed. 5. 3 \ Consequently, the against petitioner/Accused No.1 S.N.Puram Police Station, Vijayawada City criminal petition is allowed and the in 289 of 2024 . are hereby quashed.
proceedings on the file of As a sequel thereto, i shall stand closed. interlocutory applications pending, if any A-\ Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER I To,
1. The Station House Officer, Satyanarayanapuram Police Station, Vijayawada City, Krishna District. 2. One CC to Sri Chevuri Rama Swamy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Palaparthi Prabhakar, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT]
5. Three CD Copies *Joint Compromise Memo enclosed (vide separate sheet) BSV (gsg)
HIGH COURT DATED: 02/04/2025 \ COMMON ORDER I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 In/And CRLP.No.8742 of 2024 I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2024 are ALLOWED ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION
IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI I.A.No.
OF 2025 IN CRLP.No. 8742 OF 2024 Between: Peddapalli Vidya Sagar, (A1) Son of Veerachary, aged 36 years, Resident of Flat No. 419, Indira Enclave, Ayodhyanagar,'*\/ijayawada, N.T.R. District. Petitioner/ Accused AND
1. Maharna Chandrasekar, son of Late Narasimha Murthy, Aged 60 years, resident of Door No. 23-18-11, Vyakaranamvari Street, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada, N.T.R. District. ...Respondent/D/F complainant
2. The State of AP, Satyanarayana Puram Police Station, Rep. through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature, A.P. Amaravathi, Guntur District. ...Complainant/ Respondent JOINT MEMO FILED BY PETITIONER & RESPONDENT No. 1 The above petitioner and 1®‘ respondent humbly submits this Joint Memo as under:
1. That the Petitioner and the 1®‘Respondent got some problems in their business, due to the intervention of the both elders and relative now there is no dispute between them and both are compromised with terms and conditions before the elders orally. 2. The petitioners/Accused A1 and 1®‘ Respondent/ defacto complainant have agreed the terms of compromise by which the petitioner/AI is ready and willing to implement the terms and conditions.
That the 1®‘ respondent agreed to withdraw the Crime No.289/2024 before S.N.Puram P.S against Petitioner/1®’ Accused and also to compound the case in Crime No. 289 of 2024 before the S.N.Puram Police /
' -0’ Station, Vijayawada City, NTR District against Petitioner/1 Accused. As he Paid the settled amount of Rs.11.22,510/- (Rupees Eleven Lakhs Twenty Tvjo Thousand Five Hundred and Ten Only) through Demand Draft Of S.B.I , I Town Vijayawada bearing No.608703 .Dtd. 09-01-2025. 3. That the parties have agreed not to file any further cases against each other and in future they are ready to cooperate with the 1®‘ respondent for withdrawing the case filed againstthd accused and to implement as per the compromise before the eiders it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to record the compromise by compounding the offence against the petitioner and consequently acquit him in the interest of justice, by quashing the proceedings in Crime No. 289 of 2024 before the S.N.Puram, Police Station, Vijayawada City, NTR District against Petitioner/Accused No.1 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Hence, this Joint Memo, n 2 ^ 0.%, - sk‘9. i Respondent:- Q r . Petitioners:-
1. V). ^ A V, Counsel for the Respondent No.1 Counsel for the Petitione 25-02-2025 Amaravati \ I