1 2025:CGHC:49401 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5152 of 2025 1 - Rameshwar Naktode S/o Late K.L. Naktode Aged About 63 Years (Former President- Kunbi Samaj Society) R/o House No. C-6/4, Sector-4, Udaya Society, Tatibandh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Commerce And Industries, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Registrar Of Societies (Appointed Under Section 4(1) Of The C.G. Society Registration Act, 1973), Office At 3rd Floor, Block I, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Devraj Pardhi S/o Ragho Pardhi Aged About 67 Years R/o Near Doordarshan Kendra, Shree Ram Nagar, Anupam Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Purushottam Tondre S/o Rameshwar Tondre Aged About 70 Years R/o Sainath Colony, Kota, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Shyam Deshmukh S/o Premlal Deshmukh Aged About 44 Years R/o Near Kendriya Jal Aayog, Bhawani Nagar, Kota, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ----Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Satish Gupta, G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 26/09/2025 1. By way of the present writ petition,the petitioner is not challenging any particular order but is seeking a direction from this Hon'ble Court to the Respondent No. 1 & 2, to decide upon the petitioner's representation dated 25.03.2025 and 12.04.2025 pending before respondent no. 1 & 2 Digitally signed by JYOTI JHA Date: 2025.09.26 17:30:05 +0530 2 (ANNEXURE P-3), within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court, for the reason that even after lapse of more than 8 ½ months, till date no action has been taken by the authority that to decide the application/representation of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for respondents submits that in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioner seeking direction to respondent-authorities to consider the pending representation, he is having no objection to the limited prayer and pending representation dated 25.03.2025 and 12.04.2025 will be considered in accordance with law. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case instead of keeping this petition pending, I find it appropriate to dispose of the same at this stage directing the respondents No. 1 & 2 to consider/decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-3) dated 25.03.2025 and 12.04.2025 in accordance with law/rules/regulations as expeditiously as possible after giving opportunity of hearing to the concerned parties. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Jyoti