RAM CHARAN SAINI S/O SHRI GENDA RAM SAINI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/18998/2018 · 2025-12-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44164 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44164 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51356] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18998/2018
1. Ram Charan Saini S/o Shri Genda Ram Saini, Aged About 59 Years, R/o Jhareda Road, Hindaun City, District Karauli. At Present Working As Gram Vikas Adhikari At Panchayat Samiti, Hindaun City, District Karauli
2. Bhagwati Prasad Sharma S/o Shri Amarnath Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Village And Post Jagar, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli. At Present Working As Gram Vikas Adhikari At Panchayat Samiti, Hindaun City, District Karauli ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Karauli
3. Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Hindaun, District Karauli ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG with Mr. Prateek Saxena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/12/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be accepted and allowed and by an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to
[2025:RJ-JP:51356] (2 of 3) [CW-18998/2018] regularize the services of the petitioners from the date of their initial appointment and accordingly grant the pay scale of Rs. 9300- 34800 with grade pay of Rs. 3600/- to the petitioners on completion of 9 years service and accordingly revise their pay scales and selection scales and the arrears whereof be also paid to them with interest @ 12% p.a. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 29.08.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14630/2019 (Babu Lal Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, on the basis of judgment in case of Raj Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5400/2015 decided on 12.04.2017. He further submits that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid
order.
3. Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notice. Office is
directed to reflect his name as counsel for the respondents.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is
disposed of in light of the case of Babu Lal Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case.
[2025:RJ-JP:51356] (3 of 3) [CW-18998/2018]
5. The writ petition is disposed of on basis of facts as claimed by the petitioners, however, the respondents are at liberty to consider applicability of ratio in case of Raj Kumar Agrawal (supra).
6. The writ petition and misc. application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/166