DEEPAK SINGH BISHT ALIAS DEEPU v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
BA1/520/2025 · 2025-04-02
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4416 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4416 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:2417 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 520 of 2025
Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Ayush Agrawal, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. The present applicant’ Deepak Singh Bisht alias Deepu’ is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 14.01.2025 bearing FIR No. 0004 of 2025 P.S. Kotwali Almora, District Almora, wherein, the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 2/3 U.P. (Uttarakhand) Gangster and Anti Social Activities Prevention Act, 1986.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on the basis of the three cases the applicant has been implicated with another person Gaurav Singh Bisht, who is shown to be a gang leader. He submits that in these three cases in two cases the applicant already enlarged on bail and in other one which pertains to NDPS Act the applicant has been convicted on his confessional statement.
5. Learned A.G.A. Pankaj Joshi have not disputed this fact that on the basis of three cases the applicant has been implicated in this FIR, however he submits that investigation is still going on.
6. Apart from this, in respect of other three cases he has not disputed this fact that in two cases the applicant is on bail and in other one, the applicant has been convicted on his confessional statement with the sentence of two months six days imprisonment.
7. After hearing arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into
consideration that though applicant was earlier implicated in three cases but in two cases the applicant was enlarged on bail and in other one case the applicant was convicted on his confessional statement, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail by putting
2025:UHC:2417 some stringent conditions.
8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed.
9. Let the applicant ‘Deepak Singh Bisht’ be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
10. It is made clear after being released on bail the applicant will report his presence to the concerned nearest police station in each 15 days and the concerned S.H.O. shall record his presence.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 02.04.2025 PR
2025:UHC:2417