EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION v. M/S THE CRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE & ANR.
CWP/17623/2006 · 2025-07-21
Harsimran Singh Sethi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44159 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44159 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-4081-2005(O&M) -1- CWP-17623-2006 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 CWP-4081-2005(O&M) Date of Decision :21.07.2025 The Christian Medical College Society
...Petitioner
Versus The Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal and others
...Respondents CWP-17623-2006 (O&M) Employees’ Provident Fund Organization ...Petitioner
Versus M/s The Christian Medical College & Hospital, Ludhiana and another ...Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Shiv Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-4081-2005 & for respondent No.1 in CWP-17623-2006. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for the petitioner in CWP-17623-2006 and for respondent No.2.
in CWP-4081-2005. * * * Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)
1. The present petitions have been filed by the Employees Provident Fund Organization against the award challenging the reduction of the penalty to the tune of 40% as well as by Christian Medical College AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.23 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-4081-2005(O&M) -2- CWP-17623-2006 (O&M) Society on the ground that complete waiver of penalty has not been awarded by the Tribunal.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the similar award of reduction in the penalty imposed passed by the Tribunal was challenged by the Employees Provident Fund Organization by filing a writ petition, which writ petition was decided by this Court while passing order in CWP-3985-2017 titled as Employees Provident Fund Organization and another vs. Punjab State Co-operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. and another along with connected cases, on 17.03.2025 after considering the law on the issue and the cases have been remanded back to the Appellate Tribunal hence, the present petitions be also remanded back to the Appellate Tribunal keeping in view the detailed reasons given in the said
judgment.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Organization has not been able to dispute the said factual position.
4. Keeping in view the above, the impugned orders in the respective petitions are set aside and the cases are remanded back to the Appellate Tribunal for fresh adjudication keeping in view the detailed reasons given in the order passed by this Court in CWP-3985-2017 titled as Employees Provident Fund Organization and another vs. Punjab State Co- operative Supply and Marketing Federation Ltd. and another along with connected cases, on 17.03.2025.
5. Parties are directed to appear before the Tribunal on
18.08.2025.
AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.23 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-4081-2005(O&M) -3- CWP-17623-2006 (O&M)
6. Present petitions are disposed of accordingly.
7. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
8. Civil miscellaneous application pending, if any, is also disposed of. July 21, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) aarti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No AARTI SHARMA 2025.07.23 17:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document