SUGAD SINGH SON OF SHRI CHIRMOLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLR/2190/2025 · 2025-12-01
Pramil Kumar Mathur
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44157 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44157 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48736] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2190/2025 Sugad Singh Son Of Shri Chirmoli, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Mehrawar, Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail, Bayana, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Chandra Mohan Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 01/12/2025
1. Delay in filing the revision petition is condoned and application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act is allowed.
2. This revision petition has been filed assailing the order dated 19.11.2025 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Bharatpur (hereinafter referred to as 'learned trial Court') by which the learned Appellate Court has refused to deposit the cost of the prosecution imposed under Section 5 of Probation Act, on the ground that application has been filed with the delay of two months.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is an illiterate person living below the poverty line and due to his ailment he could not comply with the order of trial Court about deposition of the prosecution cost in stipulated time.
[2025:RJ-JP:48736] (2 of 2) [CRLR-2190/2025]
4. Considering the grounds narrated by learned counsel for the petitioner, this criminal revision petition is allowed with the condition to deposit the cost of prosecution as imposed by the learned Appellate Court within fifteen days from today, otherwise the sentence of the trial Court dated 26.06.2023 shall prevail.
5. The Criminal Revision is disposed of accordingly.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/45