Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44157 (KAR)

FRIENDS RECREATION ASSOCIATION KUNDAGOL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/101624/2025 · 2025-04-07

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6093 WP No. 101624 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 101624 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: FRIENDS RECREATION ASSOCIATION KUNDAGOL, HEAD OFFICE AT: KUNDAGOL, TQ: KUNDAGOL, DIST: DHARWAD-581 113, NOW BRANCH AT: HOUSE BEARING SY. NO.72/2, BASAVANAKATTI, SOMANAKATTI VILLAGE IN KARAJGI LIMITS, TQ: HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI-581 128, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, PRAVEEN RAMAPPA MUDDENNAVAR, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE JOB, KANAKDAS NAGAR, KUNDAGOL, TQ: KUNDAGOL, DIST: DHARWAD-581 113. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. ZANZA SHAILESH JOSHI AND SRI. MANJUNATH BALIKAI, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENAGALURU-560 007. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, HAVERI-581 110. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI-581 205. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6093 WP No. 101624 of 2025 4. THE POLICE INSPECTOR, GUTTAL POLICE STATION, AT: HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI-581 118 … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Zanza Shailesh Joshi., counsel for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed on 02.04.2025 and the same may be dismissed as not pressed. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The memo dated:02.04.2025 is dismissed as not pressed. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6093 WP No. 101624 of 2025 withdraw the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, he shall not seek for recalling the same. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,RH LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 26