DWARAMPUDI SREE VANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA APRADESH
WP/9770/2024 · 2025-12-23
D Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44154 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44154 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010193312024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 9770/2024 Between: Dwarampudi Sree Vani and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Apradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. PARIMI RAMA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“to issue any order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein in trying to follow the procedure stipulated under section 47A of Indian Stamps Act, 1908, by not considering the real nature and classification of the subject matter property and not registering the same in terms of actual market valuation i.e., Rs.10,00,000/- fixed for agricultural lands existing in and around Sy.Nos.359/1 and 359/2, Annadevarapeta Village, S.R.O. Vegeswarapuram, Tallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District, as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and consequently, direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 herein to register the subject matter property in terms of actual market valuation i.e., Rs.10,00,000/- fixed for agricultural lands existing in and around Sy.Nos.359/1 and 359/2, Annadevarapeta Village, S.R.O. Vegeswarapuram, Tallapudi Mandal, East Godavari District, and pass”
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the respondent authorities and that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive. Consequently, no further adjudication is necessary, and the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE D. RAMESH 24.12.2025 klk
178 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION No.9770 of 2024
24.12.2025 kkllkk