Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44152 (RAJ)

RUPESH KUMAR @ RUPESH BHUSHAN S/O YOGESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6639/2025 · 2025-10-15

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42250] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6639/2025 Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Bhushan S/o Yogesh Kumar, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Village Ravana, Neemrana, Kotputli- Behror, Rajasthan, Permanently Resident Of Village Bhushan Kalan, Mahendragarh, Haryana. ----Accused/Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp, Jaipur. 2. Aman S/o Pooran Chand, Aged About 21 Years, Resident Of Village Raiwana, Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. ----Complainant/Non-Petitioners For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Harsh Pratap Singh with Mr. Jai Khudia HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 15/10/2025 This criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed for quashing the FIR No.0439 dated 25.08.2025 lodged by the respondent no.2/complainant (for brevity, ‘complainant’) at Police Station Neemrana, District-Kotputli-Behror for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 189(2) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Inviting attention of this Court towards the Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 06.09.2025 (Annexure-2) entered between the parties, learned counsel for the petitioner [2025:RJ-JP:42250] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6639/2025] submits that the dispute of trivial nature, the genesis of the aforesaid FIR, has amicably been settled between the parties. He, therefore, prays that the criminal miscellaneous petition be allowed. The complainant-Aman, present in person and identified by his learned counsel, acknowledging the contents of the Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 06.09.2025, submits that he has no objection if the criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR is quashed. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the contentions advanced at Bar, trivial nature of dispute involved in the matter, the contents of the Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 06.09.2025, the statement made by the complainant and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Others: (2012) 10 SCC 303, this Court deems it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous petition. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed. The FIR No.0439 dated 25.08.2025 registered at Police Station Neemrana, District-Kotputli-Behror is quashed and set aside. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Tahir/42