Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44152 (PNJ)

MOHKAM SINGH, RETIRED LECTURER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1762/2006 · 2025-05-14

Aman Chaudhary

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 929 CWP-1762-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 14.05.2025 Mohkam Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG Punjab ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. The issue raised in the present petition is for regarding the recovery of over payment of retiral benefits allegedly on the basis of wrongly fixation of pay, without therebeing any misrepresentation/suppression of facts on the part of the petitioner. 2. The Division Bench on 27.02.2006 passed the same interim order as granted in CWP-17822-2005 titled as Sohan Lal Dhand vs. State of Punjab and Others, reference of which was made in the index of the petition stating therein to be similar and pending, which has since been disposed of on 03.05.2025 along with two other writ petitions with regard to the aspect of recovery alone by relying on the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jogeshwar Sahoo and others vs. The District Judge, Cuttack and others, SLP (C) No(s). 5918-2024, decided on 04.04.2025. MOHIT 2025.05.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-1762-2006 (O&M) -2- 3. Learned State counsel despite best efforts has been unable to controvert regards the factual position and draw out any distinctive aspects in the aforementioned judgment or cite any contrary law. 4. Disposed of in terms of Sohan Lal Dhand (supra). (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 14.05.2025 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2025.05.15 15:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document