BHOMARAM SON OF BHERARAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13891/2025 · 2025-11-24
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44151 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44151 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47526] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13891/2025 Bhomaram Son Of Bheraram, Aged About 32 Years, Resident Of Khume Ki Beri, Police Station Dhorimanna, District Barmer, At Present Gram Vikash Adhikari, Gram Panchayat Dudhi, Panchayat Samiti Dhorimanna, District Barmer (Rajasthan) ( At Present In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma with Ms. Kamini Pareek For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 24/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 67/2024 registered at Police Station Special Police Station SOG, Jaipur (Raj.) for the offence(s) under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Sections 3, 4,6 of Rajasthan Public Exams (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family aged 32 years. It is submitted that the matter is triable by Magistrate and applicant is in custody ever since 26.08.2025. It is further submitted that
[2025:RJ-JP:47526] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-13891/2025] charge-sheet has been filed. Further, it is submitted that co- accused has already been enlarged on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
4. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that accused-applicant is sole bread earner of the family aged 32 years; that the matter is triable my Magistrate; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that co- accused has already been enlarged on bail and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Bhomaram Son Of Bheraram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/10