Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44150 (AP)

B.MURALI RAO & 3 OTHERS v. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD & 5 OTHER

WP/7738/2014 · 2025-07-20

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010226902014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT 'HONOURABLE SR! JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7738 OF 2014 Between: 1. B.Murali Rao, S/o. Late Lakshmikantha Rao, Aged about 58 years. 2. B.S.S. Ranga Rao, S/o. B. Ranga Rao, Aged about 45 years. 3. B. Rajendra, S/o. Late Lakshmikantha Rao,, Aged about 45 years. 4. B. Venkata Ranga Rao, S/o. Late Janakirama Rao,, Aged about 52 years. All are residents of Bathalapalli Village and Mandal, Anantapuramu District. ...Petitioners AND fr Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Rep. by its Executive 1. The^ Director, Himayath Nagar, Hyderabad. 2. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Rep. by its Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Kadapa. 3. The District Collector, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu District. 4. The Joint Collector, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu District. 5. The District Supply Officer, Anantapuramu, Anantapuramu District. 6. B Sai Prasad S/o B S Rama Rao, Aged about 59 years, R/o. Bathalapalli Village and Mandal, Anantapuramu District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in trying to issue No Objection Certificate for license of petroleum outlet in Sy.No.219-1A of Battalapalli village in favour of 6th respondent without considering the petitioner's representation Dt.28.01.2014 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct respondents 3 to 5 not to issue any No Objection Certificate in favour of 6th respondent in respect of the above stated premises and also further direct respondents 1 and 2 not to renew any license in pursuant to the earlier No Objection Certificate to run petroleum outlet in Sy.No.219-1A of Battalapalli village in favour of 6th respondent or anybody. lA NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP 9621 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the petitioner representation dated 28.1.2014 and restrain the respondents 3 to 5 from issuing no objection certificate to run petroleum outlet in Sy.No.219-A of Battalapalli village in favour of 6th respondent. / Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: SRI DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE Counsel for the Respondent No. 2; SRI SAI SANJAY SURANENI Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: APHC010226902014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] 1 MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT I Ht HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 7738/2014 Between: 1.B.MURAL1 RAO & 3 OTHERS, S/0. LATE LAKSHMIKANTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS. 2.B.S.S. RANGA RAO, S/O. B. RANGA RAO YEARS. AGED ABOUT 45 ) 1 3.B. RAJENDRA, S/O. LATE U\KSHMIKANTHA RAO, ABOUT 45 YEARS. AGED 4.B. VENKATA RANGA RAO, S/O. LATE JANAKIRAMA RAO,, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF BATHALAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1.THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD 5 OTHER, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HIMAYATH NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 2.THE INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL RETAIL SALES MANAGER, KADAPA. 3.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ANANTAPURAMU, 4.THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2 5.THE DISTRICT SUPPLY ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. OFFICER. ANANTAPURAMU, ^ ^ about 59 YEARS, DISTRICT^^^^^^^ VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in affidavit filed therewith, the High Court wrt/n^r'L^r ^ mandamus or any other appropriate It order or direction declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in Certificate for license of petroleum outlet in Sy.No.219-1A of Battalapalli village in favour of 6th respondent without considering the petitioner's representation Dt.28.01.2014 is illeaal arbitrary and consequently direct respondents 3 to 5 not to issue any No Objection Certificate in favour of 6th respondent in respect of the above stated premises and also further direct respondents 1 and 2 not to rendw H f Objection Certificate to run p troleum outlet in Sy.No.219-1A of Battalapalli village in favour of 6th respondent or anybody and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the CaS0. lA NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP 9621 OF 2014 Stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 5 to consider the petitioner representation dated 28.1.2014 and restrain the respondents 3 to 5 from issuing no objection certificate to run petroleum outlet in Sy.No 219-A of Battalapalli village in favour of 6th respondent Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N ASWARTHA NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.SAI SANJAY SURANENI 3.DEEPAK BHATTACHARJEE The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.7738 OF 2014 ORDER: i. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the this writ petition does not survive for further adjudication by this Court. cause in 2. In view of the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioners, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. f 3. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if shall stand dismissed. any. SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri. N Aswartha Narayana Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Sai Sanjay Suraneni Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri. Deepak Bhattacharjee Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. 4. 5. gsc HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 \ ORDER WP NO. 7738 OF 2014 X 11 OCT '2.^ , Current Section DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS