JAGATAPU VENKATA KRISHNA RAO (DIED) v. JAJAM USHA RANI
CRP/1641/2024 · 2025-04-22
Sumathi Jagadam
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44144 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44144 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1641 OF 2024 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India Civil Revision Petition before thos Hon’ble Court against the order dated 18-06-2024 passed in I.A.No.234 of 2024 in O.S.No.715 of 2015 passed by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole Between:
1. Jagatapu Venkata Krishna Rao (Died)
2. Jagatapu Venkata Narasamma,, W/o Venkata Krishna Rao
3. Jagatapu Ramesh,, S/o Venkata Krishna Rao,
4. Somasi Padmavathi,, W/o Srinivasa Rao, All are residents of Sri Rama Colony, Kurnool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District ...REVISION PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS AND Jajam Usha Rani, W/o Venkateswarlu, Hindu, House wife, aged about 42 years, R/o Revenue Colony, Kurnool Road, Ongole, Prakasam District ...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
lA NO: 1 OF 2024 « \ ♦ 3^ ^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances the affidavit fifed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.715 of 2015 on the file of learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole during the pendency of CRP before this Hon’ble Court /■ ; ;c.' ^ I s ■.V 1 V hir’’ Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondents :SRI. PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI The Court made the following:
9^^ APHC010314742024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY .THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT [3459] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1641/2024 Between: Jagatapu Venkata Krishna Rao (died) and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Jajam Usha Rani ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VENKATA DURGA RAO ANANTHA Counsel for the Respondent:
1.PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI
2 The Court made the following Order: The present Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 18.06.2024 passed by learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole, in I.A.No.234 of 2024 in O.S.No.715 of 2015. 2. As can be seen from the report furnished by the District Judiciary, the main suit in O.S.No.715 of 2015 itself was dismissed as not pressed on
06.09.2024. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as
3. infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed Sd/-M.SR1N1VAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Principal Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Ongole Prakasam District Sri. Venkata Durga Rao Anantha Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri. Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti Advocate [OPUC]
4. Three CD Copies
2. One CCto
HIGH COURT DATED :23/04/2025 ORDER CRP.No.1641 of 2024 ^ 0 7 AUG 2025 K 'QvfiiigwlStclkia^^ ^'■^sseaisasss^ CRP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS