1 2025:CGHC:34415 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4328 of 2019 • Dr. Prakash Ladikar S/o Shri Sarangdhar Ladikar Aged About 52 Years R/o Rishi Colony Dayalband, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Urban Administration And Development Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, Through Its Commissioner, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Joint Director, Town And Country Planning Authority, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4. Smt. Amrit Kaur W/o Shri Surinder Singh Gumber Aged About 53 Years R/o Near Old High Court Gandhi Chowk Police Station City Kotwali, Bilaspur Civil And Revenue District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5. Jogendra Singh Chawla S/o Late Shri Harbhajan Singh Chawla Aged About 51 Years R/o Dayalband, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6. Rajendra Chawla S/o Late Shri Harbhajan Singh Chawla, Aged About 52 Years R/o Dayalband, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7. Shriram Gandhi S/o Shri Bhagatram Aged About 38 Years Cloth Merchant, Budhwari Bazaar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 8. Prakash Chand Gurwani S/o Late Hotumal Gurwani Aged About 63 Years D A 15, Chandela Vihar, Priyadarshani Nagar, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 9. Shyam Gupta S/o Shri Harkeshwar Prasad Gupta , R/o Amrit Jwellers Hatri Chowk Juna, Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.07.21 14:56:50 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Bajpai, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sourabh Dangi, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Dy. Government Advocate For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21. 07.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the instant petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Recording the statement made by Ms. Bajpai, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant