GAUTAM SONI S/O SHRI MOHAN SONI v. THE RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
CW/18066/2025 · 2025-11-25
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44141 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44141 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:47785] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18066/2025 Gautam Soni S/o Shri Mohan Soni, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Govind Smruti Kunj, Adisal Singh Colony, Nainwa Road, Bundi, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Chairman Cum Managing Director (Raj.)
2. The Executive Director (Admin), Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu House Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3. The Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Bundi Depot, Distt. Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nitin Sinsinwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 25/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“The impugned action of the respondents by which the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of selection scale /ACP from the due date may kindly be held as illegal and arbitrary and further the respondents be directed to grant the benefit of selection scale / ACP on completion of 9, 18 & 27 years of service, counting the length of service from the date of initial appointment and the respondents be also directed to calculate the arrears accrued thereof and be released with interest.”
2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 20.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10581/2023 titled as Dinesh Nawariya Vs.
[2025:RJ-JP:47785] (2 of 2) [CW-18066/2025] RSRTC and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be
disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition is liable for disposal in light of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. (supra) passed by this Court.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Dinesh Nawariya Vs. RSRTC and Anr. (supra) and RSRTC and Anr. Vs. Tara Chand: DB Special Appeal Writ No.524/2018 (order dated 01.12.2021) with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the
order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /118