M/S HASEEN FRUIT COMPANY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/36024/2013 · 2025-09-22
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44137 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44137 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36024 of 2013 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 23, 2025 Mohit Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vishwa Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Adarsh Bhushan, Satish Mandhyan (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) M/S Haseen Fruit Company .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad