IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37773 OF 2018 Between: Dr. M.Venkata Swamy, S/o. Swamanna, Aged 36 years, C/o. Prof. K.Jayaraju, Department of Bio-Chemistry, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupathi - 517 502, Andhra Pradesh State. ...Petitioner AND 1. Vikarama Simhapuri University, Kakutur, Nellore - 524 320 Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar 2. Dravidian University, Kuppam, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar 3. Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupathi, Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Registrar 4. Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Anantapuramu, Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar 5. Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar 6. Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar 7. Aadi Kavi Nannayya University, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, Rep. by its Registrar 8. Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission, Vijayawada, Rep. by its Secretary ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court pleased to issue an order, direction or Writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus may be any other, appropriate, writ to (i) declare that the answer as Testosterone' and for or question I.D. No. 79840749158, the correct question I.D. No. 79840749056 the correct that the Petitioner secured more'fban 90 marks to become for the post of Assistant Professor, (iii) direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to appear for oral test with further direction answer as Papain,, (ii) declare eligible for oral test to select him if he is otherwise eligible for the post of Assistant Professor lA NO: 1 OF 201« Petition under Section 42^ (A) of Writ Rules praying that in the circumstances stated in the affiddyft flied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct {h% participate in the oral interview ?of the respondents to permit the petitioner to post of assistant professor in life sciences lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 12 (A) of Writ Rules praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to receive the counter affidavit copies on record by allowing the leave petition/delay petition in the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT. K. UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI V. SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI K DHANUNJAY REDDY, SC FOR NANNAYYA UNIVERSITY Counsel for the Respondent No.8: SRI C SRINIVASA BABA, SC FOR APPSC The Court made the following: / APHC010780212018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37773/2018 Between: 1.DR. M.VENKATA SWAMY, S/0. SWAMANNA, AGED 36 YEARS. C/0. PROF. K.JAYARAJU, DEPARTMENT OF BIO-CHEMISTRY, SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY. TIRUPATHI - 517 502, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...PETITIONER AND / 1.VIKARAMA SIMHAPURI UNIVERSITY. KAKUTUR, NELLORE - 524 320 ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 2.DRAVIDIAN UNIVERSITY, KUPPAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 3. SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 4. SRI KRISHNA DEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTAPURAMU, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 5.ACHARYA NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, GUNTUR. ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 6.ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 7.AADi KAVI NANNAYYA UNIVERSITY, RAJ AMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR 8.ANDHRA PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, VIJAYAWADA, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KUDAYASRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.C SRINIVASA BABA (SC FOR APPSC) 2.GUDDE KOTINAGULU 3.VSAI KUMAR The Court made the following: ORDER: Despite the matter being listed represented for the Petitioner. 2. The under the caption “for dismissal none proceedings sheet, dated represented for the Petitioner. 3. In that view, the Writ Petition i Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. 28.04,2025 also shows that, none IS dismissed for non-prosecution. ASSISTANT Rf9ISTRAR SECTIO //TRUE COPY// I To, OFFICER 1. Oneccto SMT. K UDAYA SRi, 2. One CC to SRI c. SRINIVASA APPSC Advocate [OPUCJ baba, standing COUNSEL FOR 3. One CC to SRI k. NANNAYYA DHANUNJAY REDDY UNIVERSITY [OPUCJ 4. One CC to SRI V.SAI KUMAR 5. One CC to SRI GUDDE 6. Three CD Copies Sree (gsg) STANDING COUNSEL FOR Advocate [OPUCJ KOTINAGULU, Advocate fOPUCJ V t \ HIGH COURT DATED;30/04/2025 \ ORDER WP.No.37773 of 2018 OF -P’- O If 2 9 SEP 2:25 rs" ★ DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS