1 903.WP.11911.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 11911 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12201 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12896 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 14090 OF 2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7322 OF 2025 IN WP/10487/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7323 OF 2025 IN WP/12896/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7324 OF 2025 IN WP/11117/2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 10487 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11117 OF 2024 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11972 OF 2025 SHRADDHA RAJENDRA MOKASE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S.R. Wakale, Ms. Neha B. Kamble, Mr. N.D. Batule, Mr. M.K. Goyanka and Mr. B.B. Bhise AGPs for Respondents/State Mr. S.R. Dheple advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in (WP/11972/2025 and WP/11972/2025) Mr. C.A. Jadhav, advocate for Respondent No.4 in (WP/11972/2025 and WP/11972/2025) ... Mr. P.R. Nangare for respondent Nos.2 and 3 in (WP/12201/2024) Mr. C.A. Jadhav for respondent No.4 in (WP/12201/2024) ... Mr. K.N. Lokhande, advocate for respondent Nos.11, 17 and 23 (WP/10487/24) Ms. Sachin B. Munde, advocate for respondent No.13 (WP/10487/24) 2026:BHC-AUG:40662-DB 2 903.WP.11911.25.odt Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi for respondent Nos.10,15, 16, 21 and 22 in (WP/10487/24) Mr. U.B. Bondar for respondent Nos.12,18 and 24 in (WP/10487/24) ... Mr. P.R. Nangare for respondent Nos.14 and 20 (WP/11117/2024) Ms. Sachin B. Munde, advocate for respondent No.18 (WP/11117/24) Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi for respondent No.9 in (WP/11117/24) Mr. V.S. Bhosale, advocate for respondent No.16 (WP/11117/24) Mr. U.B. Bondar for respondent Nos.20,34 and 48 in (WP/11117/24) ... Ms. Sachin B. Munde, advocate for respondent No.12 (WP/12896/24) Mr. P.D. Suryawanshi for respondent No.9 (WP/12896/24) Mr. S.R. Dheple for respondent Nos.13 and 19 (WP/12896/24) … Mr. P.R. Nangare for respondent Nos.2 and 3 (WP/14090/2024) Mr. C.A. Jadhav for respondent No.4 (WP/14090/2024) ... CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 03.09.2026 PER COURT: 1. When these matters were called out on previous date i.e. on 01.09.2026, learned advocates for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted that the issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the decision of this Court in Writ Petition No.13945/2025 and by the Nagpur Bench in writ petition No.6482/2024. However, since learned advocate for the petitioners was not available on that date, the matters were adjourned for today for disposal. 2. Today when the matters were called out in the morning session 3 903.WP.11911.25.odt none appears for the petitioners and the matters were kept back. None appears for the petitioners even in the second session. 3. The issue raised in this petitions is squarely covered by the decision of this Court mentioned in the earlier paragraph. For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ petitions are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) habeeb/