Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44124 (ALL)

RAJENDRA PRASAD PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 ORS.

WRIA/34731/2016 · 2025-02-07

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 34731 of 2016 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Prem Shankar Pandey,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.C. Mishra Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is listed under the heading of cases likely to have become infructuous (efflux of time). Matter is taken up in the revised call. None appears to press the writ petition. Names of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent are shown in the cause list. It is evident that the petitioner does not have any interest in prosecuting the writ petition, as the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 7.2.2025 Dhananjai Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad