SHIVRAJ SINGH RATHORE S/O SHRI TEJ SINGH RATHORE v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8663/2024 · 2025-11-25
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44121 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44121 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8663/2024 Shivraj Singh Rathore S/o Shri Tej Singh Rathore, Aged About 45 Years, R/o M.n. S-3,jk Residency -1, 21 South Niwaru Road, Police Station Jhotwara, Jaipur City ( West) (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor.
2. Gyarsi Lal Bunkar S/o Shri Jagnath, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Hotel Sugan Niwas, Sindhi Camp Bus Stand, Jaipur City (West) (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Ashish Poonia JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/11/2025
1. The instant criminal misc. petition has been preferred to quash the proceedings of the impugned FIR No.166/2024 registered with the Police Station Sindhi Camp, District Jaipur City (West) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352 of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3(2)(va) of the Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
2. The contents of the petition indicates that on account of some orders passed by the Rent Tribunal, certain nuisance was caused by the accused-petitioner with the landlady. When objections were raised, he along with other accused persons assaulted the lawyer representing the complainant, for which
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-8663/2024] the instant FIR has been registered against him for the above stated offences.
3. Bare perusal of the FIR reveals commission of a cognizable offence and the same has been investigated by the Investigating Agency and the Police is in process of submitting the charge-sheet against the accused petitioner.
4. This Court cannot adjudge the correctness of the allegations while exercising its inherent jurisdiction contained under Section 528 of the BNSS. The defence of the petitioner would be considered by the Trial Court at appropriate stage of the trial. This Court finds no valid reason to interfere with the course of investigation conducted by the Investigating Agency to quash the impugned FIR.
5. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition is dismissed. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed.
6. The factual report furnished by the Public Prosecutor is ordered to be retained on the record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/36