PINTU BAIRWA S/O BHAGWAN SAHAI BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13376/2025 · 2025-10-15
Anoop Kumar Dhand
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44119 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44119 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13376/2025 Pintu Bairwa S/o Bhagwan Sahai Bairwa, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Pathaini, Tehsil/police Station Busawar, District Bharatpur, Presently Tenant Flat No. 838, B-Block, Uday Green Residency, Nirottampura, Muhana, Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected with S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13693/2025 Sanni Yadav S/o Shri Ramkishor Yadav, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Heero Ki Dhani, Bajani Talai, 75 Fatak, Sanganer, Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur Raj. (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhanu Prakash Sharma Mr. Nikhlesh Katara with Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharam For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Dy.GA/PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/10/2025
1. Both these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS have been filed by the petitioners in connection with FIR No.441/2025, registered at Police Station Shipra Path, District
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-13376/2025] Jaipur City (South) wherein they have been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 331 (4) and 305(a) BNS. 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. Counsel submits that the petitioners are in custody since 06.08.2025 and trial will take its own time to conclude, therefore indulgence of bail be granted to the petitioners. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail applications and submitted that the petitioners are habitual offenders, against whom other cases for the same offence have been registered, hence, they are not entitled to get indulgence of bail. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioners and looking to the fact that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the petitioners are in custody since 06.08.2025 and after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take its own time to conclude and without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and appropriate to grant indulgence of bail to the petitioners under Section 483 BNSS. 6.
6. Accordingly, both the bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioners Pintu Bairwa S/o Bhagwan Sahai Bairwa and Sanni
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-13376/2025] Yadav S/o Shri Ramkishor Yadav arrested in connection with aforementioned FIR, be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. In case, the petitioners are found involved in committing and repeating the same offence in future, the Public Prosecutor/State would be at liberty to move application for cancellation of their bail before the jurisdictional Court. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/243 & S154