Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:48716
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 11230 of 2025
1. Smt. Arpana Ekka W/o Shri Rohit Aged About 35 Years Posted As- Assistant Professor At Government College, Dumhariya, Jarhi, District- Surajpur (C.G.) R/o Village- Gangapur, Latori, Tehsil- Latori, District - Surajpur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administrative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.)
3. Government College Dumaria, Jarhi, Through Its Principal, District- Surajpur (C.G.)
4. Government College Kusmi, Through Its Principal, Tehsil- Kusmi, District- Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice
Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board 23.09.2025
1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 07.07.2025 (Annexure - P/1) passed by the respondents by which the services of the petitioner have been transferred from
MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2025.09.26 10:22:30 +0530
2 Assistant Professor (Sociology) at Government College, Dumhariya, Jarhi, District - Surajpur (C.G.) to Government College, Kusmi, District - Balrampur-Ramanujganj (C.G.).
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has already preferred representation against the transfer order before the Committee so constituted by the respondents raising some personal difficulty with regard to health issue of his son.
3. Considering the well settled position of law that the personal difficulty has to be looked after by the employer only and also considering the fact that the petitioner has already preferred a representation on 08.07.2025, it is directed that the same shall be considered and decided by the Committee so constituted by the respondents within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of
order passed by this Court.
4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish