Medisetti Seetaramayya, v. Prl.Secy., Endowments dept., State of A.P.,
WP/21825/2018 · 2025-04-27
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44115 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44115 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) k.
MONDAY. THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL F TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21825 OF 2018 Between: Medisetti Seetaramayya, ^ged 33 years. Occ. Prasadam Packer, working in Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Swamy Temple, Annavaram. East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue(Endowments) Department, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Commissioner, Endowrhents Department Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishrla District. 3. Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Swamy Temple, Annavaram, East Godavari District, Rep by its Executive Officer. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 dffe Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High
Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the time scale to the petitioner in the 3 one rd respondent temple for the post Held by petitioner as Prasadam Packer as illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust, violative of Article 14, 19 and 21 of respondent to extend the time scale to the petitioner in the respondent temple and grant all consequential benefits including the monetary benefits and grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3 rd lA NO: 1 OF 2Q1fi Petition under Sectioh : 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3 rd respondent to extend the minimum time scale to the petitioner attached to the post in the cadre of Prasadam Packer in the 3'’'^ respondent temple, pending disposal of the writ petition. lA NO: 2 OF 201« Between: Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Swamy Temple, Annavaram, East Godavari District, Rep by its ExePutive Officer. ...Vacate Petitioner/R3 AND
1. Medisetti Seetaramayya, S/o. Papa Rao, Aged 33 years, Occ. Prasadam Packer, working in Sri Veera Venkata Satyanarayana Swamy Tempie, Annavaram, East Godavari District. ...Respondent/Writ Petitioner
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue(Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh. 3. The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. ...
Respondents/Respondents Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to. vacate the interim order, dt.28-06-2018 inade in lA No.1 of 2018, in WP.No,21825 of 2018. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) i Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA, SC i^OR ENDOWMENTS Court made the following
APHC010464122018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21825/2018 Between:
1.MEDISETTI SEETARAMAYYA,, S/0. PAPA RAO, AGED 33 YEARS, OCC. PRASADAM PACKER, WORKING IN SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA SWAMY TEMPLE, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.PRL SECY ENDOWMENTS DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE(ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3.SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA SWAMY TEMPLE, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner;
2 1.VS KRAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR \ ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2.KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments The Court made the following:
^y* THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 21825 OF 2018
ORDER; This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer:
“....to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not extending the time scale to the petitioner in the 3rd respondent temple for the post held by petitioner as Prasadam Packer as illegal arbitrary improper unjust violative of Article 14 19 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to extend the time scale to the petitioner in the 3rd respondent temple and grant all consequential benefits including the monetary benefits and grant....”
2. Heard Sri V.S.K.Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Koteswara Rao Kappera, learned Standing Counsel for the temple.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that at the time of filing this Writ Petition, the petitioner was directly working under the \ control of the temple. During the pendency of the petition, the said worker was entrusted to the contractor; at present, the petitioner is working under the contractor.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the temple would submit that the temple has nothing to do with the petitioner because the temple has given a contract to a third party under whom the petitioner is working.
T 2 Learned Standing Counsel would submit appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made that the Court may pass
5. and a fair look at the material placed on record. It is neediess to say that irrespective of the fact that the petitioner the contractor, the temple has to wages as fixed by the Government from time to time.
6. In that view, it is apposite to dispose of the by directing the temple to ensure the payment of minimum fixed by the Government from time to time to the was engaged by the temple directly or through ensure the payment of minimum present Writ Petition wages as petitioner. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
7. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/-'B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION^ICER j Revenue //TRUE COPY// To, of Andhra Pradesh, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Principal Secretary, State (Endowments) Department, Secretariat,
1. The Andhra Pradesh. Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh
2. The Commissioner Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District. Venkata Satyanarayana Swamy Executive Officer, Sri. Veera East Godavari District.
3. The Temple, Annavaram
4. One CC to SRI. V S K RAMA RAO Advocate [OPUC]
/
5. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP), High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
6. One CC to SRI KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERS, Standing Counsel for Endowments [OPUC]
7. Three CD Copies sree
HIGH COURT DATED;28/04/2025 \
ORDER WP.No.21825 of 2018 DISPOSING OF THE W.P.
WITHOUT COSTS