Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44114 (RAJ)

BHANWAR LAL CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI MADAN LAL v. BANK OF INDIA

CW/14160/2025 · 2025-10-27

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42945] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14160/2025 1. Bhanwar Lal Choudhary S/o Shri Madan Lal, aged about 50 years, Proprietor- M/s. New Choudhary Enterprises, Resident Of D-19 Kendriya Vihar, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Shubham Choudhary S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of D-19, Kendriya Vihar, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Mrs. Sarla Devi W/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Choudhary, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of D-19, Kendriya Vihar, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus Bank Of India, Sikar Branch, Near Head Post Office, Jatia Bazar, Sikar-332001 And/or Zonal Office At Star House, B-4, Sector-2, Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur-302004, Through Its Authorised Officer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Naresh Vijay, Adv. with Mr. Priyank Sanwariya, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla, Adv. with Mr. Raghav Sharma, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 27/10/2025 After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the petition with the directions to respondent to give opportunity to the petitioners to file their reply in accordance with the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of State Bank of India Vs. Rajesh Agarwal reported in (2023) 6 SCC 1. [2025:RJ-JP:42945] (2 of 2) [CW-14160/2025] With the aforesaid liberty, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the petitioners are entitled to file a fresh, in case, any fresh cause of action arises. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /18