1 2025:CGHC:1597 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 2012 of 2018 • Banshi Lal Kasyakar, S/o Deenbandhu Kasyakar, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Thumsa, Post Office And Police Station Patewa, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Non Applicant No.1) (Registered Owner Of Vehicle Eeco Bearing Registration No. C.G.-06-GC-3193). ... Appellant versus 1. Smt Rajkumari Diwan, W/o Late Hariram Diwan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Chitamkhar, Post Jhara, Police Station Bhimkhoj, Tahsil & District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Claimant). 2. Pokhraj Diwan, S/o Late Hariram Diwan, Aged About 17 Years, Being Minor On Behalf Of Through Their Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Rajkumari Diwan Res. No.1, R/o Village Chitamkhar, Post Jhara, Police Station Bhimkhoj, Tahsil & District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Claimant). 3. Ku. Gitanjali Diwan, D/o Late Hariram Diwan, Aged About 14 Years, Being Minor On Behalf Of Through Their Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Rajkumari Diwan Res. No.1, R/o Village Chitamkhar, Post Jhara, Police Station Bhimkhoj, Tahsil & District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Claimant). 4. Firturam Diwan, S/o Late Noharsingh Diwan, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Village Chitamkhar, Post Jhara, Police Station Bhimkhoj, Tahsil & District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Claimant). 5. Smt. Satobai Diwan, W/o Firturam Diwan, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Village Chitamkhar, Post Jhara, Police Station Bhimkhoj, Tahsil & District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh (Claimant). 6. The Branch Manager, The New India Insurance Company Ltd., Through Branch Manager, Branch Office, Madina Building, Jail Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Non Applicant No.2) (Insurer Of Vehicle Eeco Bearing Registration No. C.G.-06- GC-3193). ... Respondents (Cause title taken from Case Information System) 2 For Appellant : Mr. Kalpesh Ruparel, Advocate. For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Dashrath Gupta, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 10/01/2025 1. Heard on I.A. No.3/2024, application for withdrawal of the case. 2. Counsel for the appellant submits that appellant is a registered owner of the vehicle. He further submits that matter has been settled between the parties out of the Court, therefore, appellant does not want to prosecute the instant appeal, hence he prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. 3. On due consideration, I.A. No.3/2024 is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw the instant appeal. 4. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Registry is directed to return the record of the concerned tribunal, forthwith. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA NIRALA Date: 2025.01.10 17:25:47 +0530