IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5916 OF 2021 Between: 1. Shaik. Allahu Sammad alias Shaik. Munna, S/o. Khaja Mohiddin Muslim, 24y, AC Technician. 2. Shaik. Shakeela alias Thahaseen in FIR W/o. Khaja Mohiddin, Muslim 45y, House Wife. 3. Shaik. Nagoor Sharif alias Shareef, Muslim, 27y, Bank Employee All are resident of D.No. 14-4-42-2, Mulla Street, Kandukur town and Mandal, Prakasam Dt. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 to 3 AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Amaravathi for the State of Andhra Pradesh, Amaravathi. 2. Syed. Karishma, W/o. Shaik, Allahu sammad alias Shaik. Munna 24y House Wife r/o. Santosh Nagar Kandukuru Town and Mandal, Prakasam Dt. ...Respondent/ Defacto Complainant Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be Pleased to quash the entire proceedings in Crime No. 21 of 2017 of Kandukuru Town Police Station. I.A. NO: 2 0F 2021 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners in Crime No. 21 of 2017 of Kandukuru Town Police Station pending disposal of the main Criminal Petition and pass This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri CH NAGENDRA SARMA, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1. The Court made the following order: • APHC010396292021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) QMS [3333] TUESDAY JHE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5916/2021 Between: Shaik, Allahu Sammad Alias Shaik and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.CH NAGENDRA SARMA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR.No.21 of 2017 on the file of Kandukuru Town Police Station. Today when the petition is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has produced a copy of instructions of the Sub- Inspector of Police, Kandukuru Town Police Station wherein it is stated that after due investigation by the Police, the case ended up with acquittal under Section 235(1) Cr.P.C by 2 23.11.2022 vide SC.No.94 of 2021. 2. nd Additional District Judge Court, Ongole on 3. In view of the fact that the case was ended up in acquittal vide SC.No.94 of 2021, dated 23.11.2022 on the file of 2'^'^ Additional District Judge Court, Ongole, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders would be necessary in the present petition. 4. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed. Sd/- K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER / //TRUE COPY// To, House Officer, Kandukuru Town Police Station, Prakasham 1. The Station District. Sri. CH Nagendra Sarma, Advocate [OPUC] Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.[OUT] 2. OneCCto 3. TwoCCsto 4. Three CD Copies vna ✓ HIGH COURT DATED:21/01/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.5916 of 2021 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS