1 2025:CGHC:48247 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5005 of 2025 Dashrath Singh S/o Dev Chand Aged About 42 Years Caste - Gond R/o Village Podipa Thasil Latori Ps Jainagar District - Surajpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, P.O. And P.S. Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Collector Surajpur, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Surajpur District- Surajpur (C.G.) 4 - Ramnarayan S/o Sukhammar Aged About 68 Years Caste Kaser R/o Village Podipa Tahsil Latori P.S. Jainagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 5 - Duba Ram S/o Sukhammar Aged About 65 Years Caste Kaser R/o Village Podipa Tahsil Latori P.S. Jainagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) 6 - Barnu Kaser S/o Shankar Aged About 80 Years Caste Kaser R/o Village Podipa Tahsil Latori P.S. Jainagar, District- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Pandey, Advocate on behalf of Mr. VK Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Ms. Akansha Verma, PL ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 19.09.2025 1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs: “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notices to the respondents returnable within early date of hearing. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to Direct the respondent no.2 & 3 to consider and decide the representation moved by the petitioner in accordance with Law within stipulated period. 10.3 Grant any other relief(s)/ order(s)/ direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which deemed fit & proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.4 Cost of the petition.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner Annexure P3, within any specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that she is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P/3, expeditiously, in accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent Nos.4 to 6. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-