IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY j TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ PRESENT HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR,CHIEF JUSTIE AND HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 2659 OF 2003 Between: Sri Chunduru Seetharama Prasad, s/o Venkateswara Rao BUSINESS M/s Sri Venkateswara Trading Company D.No.1-4/5-36A., Ramjaswanth., Kamakothinagar, Vidyadharapuram, ...PETITIONER AND 1. Chief General Manager, Reserve Bank of India., Saifabad., Hyderabad. 2. Managing Director., Laxmi Vilas Bank Limited., Karur., Tamil Nadu State. 3. Branch Manager., Laxmi Vilas Bank Limited., B.R.P.Road., Vijayawada. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent No.2 and 3 to consider the application submitted by the petitioner on 17-03-2001 and the subsequent reminders under the Time Settlement Scheme, declaring their inaction as illegal and ultra vires to the provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2003fVWMP. NO: 2256 OF 2003) Between: 1 The Laxmi Vilas Bank Limited., rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, Karur, Tamil Nadu State. 2. Branch Manager., Laxmi Vilas Bank Limited., B.R.P.Road., Vijayawada. Petitioners/Respondents/Respondents AND 1. M/s. Sri Venkateswara Trading Company, A firm represented by its Managing Partner Sri Chunduru Seetharama Prasad, S/o.Venkateswara Rao, Hindu, aged 50 years, Business, D.No.1-4/S- 36A, Ramjaswanth, Kamakothinagar, Vidyadharapuam, Vijayawada. 2. Reserve Bank of India, Represented by its Chief General Manager, Saifabad, Hyderabad.500 001. f Respondent/Respondent/Respondent (R2 is not a necessary party) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim stay granted in WP.MP.No.3481 of 2003 in WP.No.2659/2003 dated 12-06-2003. I.A. NO: 2 OF 2003fWPIVIP. NO: 3481 OF 2003) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings in R.P.No. 196/2002 in O.A.No.991/1997 on the file of the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Visakhapatnam including conducting of auction. Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. VSR ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. S RAVI Counsel for the Respondents: — The Court made the following: ORDER [3483] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI APHC010104152003 r. WRIT PETITION NO; 2659 of 2003 l4 ...Petitioner M/s. Sri Venkateswara Trading Company Vs. ...Respondents Reserve Bank of India and others ********** NONE Advocate for Petitioner Advocate for Respondents NONE COR^^THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR * '§RirJi^STICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE ' ;'22"'‘ January, 2025 it i - i PC : None for the petitioner. longer interested in pursuing the It appears that the petitioner is no matter. The proceedings are accordingly closed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, including IA.No.3 of 2003 (WPMP.No.15404 of 2003) shall also stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHAW assistant REGISTRAR //true COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, ANJANEYALU Advocate [OPUC] 1. OneCCto SRI. V S R 2. Three C.D.Copies HIGH COURT DATED:22/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.2659 of 2003 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS