APHC010397002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) : r-v s FRIDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20154 OF 2025 Between: 1. M V S Hari Prasad, C/o. M S V Ramana, Aged about 40 years, R/o 6- Floor, Happy Homes Road No 2 Chalasani Kanuru, Vijayawada (Rural), Krishna District Andhra Pradesh - St 1 570, Flat No-101 Nagar, 520007 2. Praveen Kumar Jangayya, C/0 Jangayya, Aged about 39 years, R/o 12-14-90, Jantha Nagar, Behind Care Wood School, Balanagar, K.v. Rangareddy Telangana-500018. 3. Valdas Kiran, S/o Marayya, Aged about 42 years Rajeev Nagar, Near Rama Rice Mill, Suryapet, Nalgonda, Telangana. R/o 3-11-14/1, ...Petitioners AND State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home 1. The Department, Secretariat, Amaravati. 2. The commissioner of Police, Vijayawada Commissionerate, Krishna District. 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Gannavaram PS, Krishna District 4. The S H O, Gannavaram PS, Krishna District. 5. W Sivaprasad, The Circle Inspector of Police Krishna District Gannavaram PS, Venkata Rao, S/o Seshagiri Rao, Aged about 52 years R/o Sentini Hospital, Beside Vinayaka Theater, 6. Yarlagadaa MLA Gannavaram Vijayawada, Krishna District ...Respondents under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that Petition in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the high handed, arbitrary and nature malafidy action of the respondents in harassing the petitioners in pay the amount to the Respondent no. 6 and insist them to surrender before connection with the firm transactions with out any Respondent no. 6 in complaint contrary to law, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Art.19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and searching the house in any mode in the interest of justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and nor searching the house in any mode in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI KODE RAMESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 4:SRI V FAROOK AGP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.5: --- The Court made the following order: 1 C’ APHC010397002025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY.THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20154/2025 Between; 1.MVS HARl PRASAD, C/0 M S V RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/0 6-570, FLAT NO-101, 1ST FLOOR, HAPPY HOMES ROAD NO 2 CHALASANI NAGAR, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA (RURAL), KRISHNA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 520007 2.PRAVEEN KUMAR JANGAYYA, C/0 JANGAYYA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, SCHOOL, BALANAGAR, K.V. RANGAREDDY TELANGANA-500018 R/0 12-14-90, JANTHA NAGAR, BEHIND CARE WOOD 3.VALDAS KIRAN,, S/0 MARAYYA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/0 3- NEAR RAMA RICE MILL, SURYAPET, 11-14/1, RAJEEV NAGAR, NALGONDA, TELANGANA ...PETITIONER(S) AND REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI VIJAYAWADA 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, COMMISSIONERATE KRISHNA DISTRICT 3.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, GANNAVARAM PS, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4.THE S H O, GANNAVARAM PS, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5.VV SIVAPRASAD, GANNAVARAM PS, KRISHNA DISTRICT THE CIRCLE ^ INSPECTOR OF POLICE 2 6.YARLAGADDA VENKATA RAO, S/0 SESHAGIRI RAO, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS MLA GANNAVARAM, R/0 SENTINI HOSPITAL, BESIDE VINAYAKA THEATER. VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the high handed, arbitrary and malafidy action of the respondents in harassing the petitioners in pay the amount to the Respondent no. 6 and insist them to surrender before Respondent no. 6 in connection with the firm**transactions with out any complaint contrary to law, is illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Art.19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and searching the house in any mode in the interest of justice and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and nor searching the house in any mode in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S); 1.KODERAMESHBABU Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: ... to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the high handed, arbitrary and malafidy action of the respondents in harassing the petitioners in pay the amount to the Respondent no. 0 and insist them to surrender before Respondent no. 6 in connection with the firm transactions with out any complaint contrary to law, is illegai, arbitrary, and violative of Art.19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently consequently direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners and his family members by calling to the police stations and searching the house in any mode in the interest ofjustice and to pass....” Heard Sri K.Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the police calling the petitioners and pressuring him to pay the amount which is alleged to have been due to the respondent No.6. Learned counsel would further submit that the petition may be disposed of by giving proper directions to the police. 2. 3. are Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to call the petitioners to the police station, if there is no any crime registered against the petitioners. The police further directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the respondent No.6 and the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. 5. are .1 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand Sd/- N NAGAWIWIA assistant registrar n .Qo-V ^ SECTION OFFICER closed. //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat, Amaravati 2. The commissioner of Police, Vijayawada Commissionerate Krishna District 3. The Circle Inspector of Police, Gannavaram PS, Krishna District 4. The S H O, Gannavaram PS, Krishna District. 5. 7. One CC to SRI. KODE RAMESH BABU, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 8. Three CD Copies PRK HIGH COURT DATED:01/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 20154 OF 2025 g Ji,nfT2(l25 i ^ , Current Section mfT-^ DISPOSING OF THE WP, WITHOUT COSTS