Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44105 (KAR)

SUHAS RATHOD S/O SHIVANNA RATHOD v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/100614/2024 · 2025-03-11

Shivashankar Amarannavar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4569 CRL.P No. 100614 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100614 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SUHAS RATHOD S/O. SHIVANNA RATHOD, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE, R/O: VINAYAKA COLONY, SANTHOSH NAGAR, HUBBALLI – 580 032. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. IRANAGOUDA K. KABBUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, THROUGH HOSPET RURAL POLICE STATION, REPT. BY ADDL. SPP, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DIST: DHARWAD. 2. SMT. PRIYANKA K. A., AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, R/O: BEHIND KR ARJUN, CHIRANJEEVI HOSPITAL, AMARAVATHI GANGAMMA COMPOUND, HOSAPETE, DIST: VIJAYANAGAR – 583 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAMESH B. CHIGARI, AGA FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.482 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2 IN HOSAPETE RURAL P.S. CRIME NO. 257/2023 FOR THE OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 498A, 323, 504, 506, READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC AND SECTIONS 3 AND 4 OF D.P. ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HOSAPETE. VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND B RESPECTIVELY. IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR Digitally signed by ASHPAK KASHIMSA MALAGALADINNI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4569 CRL.P No. 100614 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Memo reads thus; “Herein, the Advocate for petitioner most humbly Submits as under. That, in the top noted matter, the Respondent have completed the investigation and filed charge-sheet. Therefore, the petitioner intends to withdraw the petition with an intention to challenge the charge sheet, if necessary. Hence the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice. Hence this memo.” 3. In view of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Registry is directed to return all the documents to learned counsel for the petitioner. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE PJ/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14