Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44101 (KAR)

SHRI VAYUKUMAR KALLAPPA PAVAR v. ST. MILAGRACE CREDIT SOUDHARDHA

CRL.RP/100327/2024 · 2025-04-15

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6416 CRL.RP No. 100327 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100327 OF 2024 (397(CR.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SHRI VAYUKUMAR KALLAPPA PAVAR AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. JAVALI, POST: YADOGA, HALYAL-581329, TQ. HALYAL, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHETAN T. LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE) AND: ST. MILAGRACE CREDIT SOUDHARDHA CO-OPERATIVE LTD., KARWAR, BRANCH: HALYAL-581329, R/BY. ITS HALYAL BRANCH JUNIOR ASSISTANT, SHRI SAMIULLA ABDUL RAZAK NADAF, NEAR FISH MARKET, HALYAL-581329, TALUK: HALYAL, DIST. UTTARA KANNADA. …RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT-NOTICE SERVED) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W. 401 OF CR.P.C. (UNDER SECTION 438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS) SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 02.01.2024 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARWAR (SITTING AT SIRSI) AT SIRSI, UTTARA KANNADA IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5040/2023 AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 28.02.2023 PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL IN C.C.NO.78/2019 FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 138 OF NI ACT. MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.04.17 14:49:49 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6416 CRL.RP No. 100327 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. Memo reads as under: “In the top noted case, the Revision Petitioner has paid entire cheque amount to the respondent-Bank and the Bank has also acknowledged the same and the parties have settled their dispute before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Court., Haliyal. Therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant Revision Petition in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HMB CT:PA LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 26