Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44096 (RAJ)

MAHESH KUMAR @ MAHESH SAMOTA S/O GOPAL SINGH SAMOTA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15601/2025 · 2025-12-01

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48724] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15601/2025 Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Samota S/o Gopal Singh Samota, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 37, Tirupati Vihar, New Loha Mandi Marg, Machda Rajawaas, Jaipur. (Accused Is In Judicial Custody At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain with Mr. Samarth Kumar Jain Ms. Anshu Agarwal Mr. Amit Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 01/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 312/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 191(2), 190, 121(1), 132, 302 of BNS, 2023 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that applicant is approximately 30 years of age, his antecedents are of similar nature, and allegation are of pasting of a poster at the public place/University campus. It is submitted that the matter is triable by Magistrate, and all co-accused have been already [2025:RJ-JP:48724] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15601/2025] enlarged on bail. It is submitted that applicant is in custody since 19.11.2025 and has been falsely implicated in the matter. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has strongly objected to the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties, considering the overall facts and circumstances, and taking note of the fact that applicant is in custody since 19.11.2025; that applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter; that the matter is triable by Magistrate, however, without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mahesh Kumar @ Mahesh Samota S/o Gopal Singh Samota shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/s-5