Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44095 (AP)

TUNGA RAMA DEVI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11111/2025 · 2025-04-29

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL. TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SAT WRIT PETITION NO: 11111 OF 2025 , , I-/"' t-""" U'-'' Between: Tunga Rama Devi, W/o. Late Tunga Surendra Babu, Aged about 63 Occ: Housewife, R/o at H.No.23-118/1/2/6/2, Vidyanagar, Beside Theatre, Punganur Post, Town and Mandal, Chittoor District-51724 7. years, MSR ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Ene^y Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amravati, Guntur District 2. The Managing Director, AP S^thern Power Distribution Company Ltd., D.No. 19-13/65/A, Tiruchanoor Road, Srinivasapuram, Tirupati, Tirupati District. 3. The Superintending Engineer, Operation Circle, AP Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., CHittoor, Chittoor District.^/" 4. The Assistant Engineer, Operation, AP Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Melupatia, Punganur Town, Post and Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENTS I Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order or orders, direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent for not providing power supply by fixing new electricity meter to the - petitioner's shop service No.5811406015886 in Survey No.118 (Paimaish No. 180) of an extent of Ac.0.05 cents out of total extent of an extent of AC.0.3J8 cents situated at Mudeppa Circle, Punganur, Chittoor District is illegal,, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 4th respondent herein to provide power supply to the petitioner's shop by fixing new electricity meter forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent herein to provide power supply to the petitioner’s shop by fixing new electricity meter to the petitioner’s service No. 5811406015886 in Survey No.118 (Paimaish No. 180) of an extent of Ac.0.0^cents out of total extent of an extent of Ac.0.38 cents situated at Mudeppa Circle^Punganur, Chittoor District, pending disposal of the main writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G KRISHNAPRASAD R0Y;\I^ Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY u. Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4: SMT. JYOTHI RATNA ANUMOLU (JR. SC FOR APSPDCL) The Court made the following: ORDER ^ ■ APHC010216272025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] 11 WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 11111/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Tunga Rama Devi AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner; 1.G.KRISHNAPRASAD ROYAL Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR ENERGY The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above writ petition is filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in not providing the power supply to the petitioner’s shop in Sy.No.118 to the extent of Ac.0.05 cents at Mudeppa Circle, Punganur, Chittoor District, is illegal and arbitrary. Heard Sri G. Krishna Prasad Royal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Jyothi Ratna Anumolu, learned Junior Standing Counsel, appeared for respondents 2 to 4. 2. Page 2 of 3 SRS,J ■ w.p.No.11111 of2025 .r: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that yesterday, the respondent authorities released the power supply to the petitioner’s shop. Learned counsel also would submit that since the power supply was released, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1. One CC to Sri G.Krishnaprasad Royal Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Energy': fligh Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. One CC to Smt. Jyothi Rafna Anumolu, Jr. SC for APSPDCL, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies - TF HIGH COURT DATED:30/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11111 of 2025 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS