1 2025:CGHC:48899-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 515 of 2025 Avinash Peswani S/o Shri Suresh Peswani aged about 33 Years Occupation- Transporter, R/o- Sheela Park Apartment, Rajkishore Nagar Bilaspur, Police Station- Sarkanda, Tahsil and District- Bilaspur, C.G. Mo. No. 7489999940 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralya, New Raipur, Police Station Kewli, Tahsil, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director General of Police State Economic Offence Investigation Bureau (Rajya Arthik Apradh Anveshan Bureau), Gaurav Path, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil and District- Raipur, C.G. 3 - Superintendent of Police Anti - Corruption Bureau / Economic Offences Wing (ACB/EOW), Gaurav Path, Telibandha, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur, C.G. 4 - P. K. Panchayati S/o U. K. Panchayati Aged About 63 Years R/o House No. 82, Geetanjali Vihar-2, Nehru Nagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District- Bilaspur, C.G. ... Respondents _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1 to 3/State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 24 . 09 .202 5 1. Heard Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate, appearing for the State / respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs : “10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records of the case, from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct to the respondent no. 2 & 3 to initiate enquiry against the respondent no. 4 in the respect of the complaint made by the petitioner and if found respondent no. 4 committed guilty under the Law, then takes appropriate action within 03 months, is in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given. 3. The prayers which the petitioner has made only amount to the fact that he want that an FIR be registered against the private respondent No.4 against whom he has grievance. But, the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the competent Court by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or 200 of the Cr.P.C. and controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by 3 this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in terms of the said order with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra