Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44087 (RAJ)

PARUL MAHESHWARI DAUGHTER OF SHRI RAMESH CHANDRA MAHESHWARI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/17334/2022 · 2025-11-27

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48348] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17334/2022 Parul Maheshwari Daughter Of Shri Ramesh Chandra Maheshwari, Aged About 33 Years, Working As Lecturer (Biology) Government Girls Senior Secondary School Ramgarh, District- Alwar Resident Of 1-Da-25, South West Block, Kala Kuan, Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Director, Secondary Department, Bikaner (Raj.). 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission , Ajmer, Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma Mr. Saroj Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 27/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: (i) The non-petitioner may be directed to treat the petitioner appointed on the post of School Lecturer (Biology) from the date person lower in merit were appointed, fixation of petitioner in the seniority list may also be revised and pay from the date person lower in merit were appointed and granted financial benefits including amending date of increment; (ii) The non-petitioners may be directed to grant the similar relif which is granted to the writ petitioners pursuant to Hon'ble Court's [2025:RJ-JP:48348] (2 of 2) [CW-17334/2022] decision dated 15.02.2019 in the case of S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1334/2019 Jitendra Singh Khichar and Ors. Vs Principal Secretary and Ors.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 15.02.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1334/2019 titled as Jitendra Singh Khichar Vs. Principal Secretary and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Jitendra Singh Khichar Vs. Principal Secretary and Anr. (supra) passed by this Court, and petitioner is directed to file a detailed representation in light of aforesaid judgment to respondents, who shall examine the representation and if ratio is applicable, shall extend the benefit as directed in case of Jitendra Singh Khichar Vs. Principal Secretary and Anr. (supra). 4. Accordingly, the writ petition along with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /154