Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44081 (AP)

NUTALAPATI VIJAYA SARADHI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11074/2025 · 2025-04-28

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAV (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF AP TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11074 OF 2025 Between: Nutalapati Vijaya Saradhi, S/0 Subbarao Aged about 58 years, R/0-1- 66-1, Peddapalem, VallabharaoPalem, Guntur Andhra Pradesh-522112 ...Petitioner/s AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home, A.P.State Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District 2. The Director General of Police, A.P.Police Headquarters, Mangalagiri, Guntur District, Andhra Pradesh ' 3. The Superintendent of Ponce^-Guntur District, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh 4. The Station House Officer, PonnurRural Police Station, Ponnur, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh ' ...Respondent/s Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affictavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order Pr direction more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents specifically Respondent No.3 and Responderit No.4 to take cognizance of the petitioners complaint dated 15:0^2025 and follow the due process of law as laid down by the Hon’ble Suupreme Court of India in LalitaKumari vs - Govt.Of U.P. & Ors in 1 WRIT F'ETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 68 OF 2008 any contrary would be violative of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India judgment LalitaKumari vs Govt.Of U.P.&Ors in 1 WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 68 OF 2008. as 7 t- • • / / lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent No;#^ Respondent No.4 to dispose of the complaint given to them dated T5.03.2025 in accordance with law; Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: V ■ ■V, APHC010221902025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) • I [3457] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE \ ; PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11074/2025 I i Between: Nutalapati Vijaya Saradhi ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. UMESH CHANDRA P V G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner is adequately redressed by the respondents and Crime No.78 of 2025 is registered. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 2 As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending 3 shall stand closed. Sd/- K KASIRAO ACHARI assistant registrar SECTIOJ>|d6F^C “ //TRUE COPY// CER To, UMESH CHANDRA P V G Advocate [OPUC] HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 1. One CC to SRI 2. Two CCS to GP FOR 3. Three CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED:29/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.11074 of 2025 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION