Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44079 (AP)

T.N. RAO, v. THE APSRTC, REP. BY REG. MANAGER & ANOTHER,

WP/7366/2005 · 2025-04-24

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010295312005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: Between: T.N. Rao, The APSRTC rep by Regional Manager and others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following Ms.Sk.Parveen, learned counsel representing Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 25.04.2025 MP IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 7366/2005 ...PETITIONER AND The APSRTC rep by Regional Manager and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): VINOD KUMAR TARLADA (SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following order: Ms.Sk.Parveen, learned counsel representing Sri S.M.Subhan, learned submitted that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) Ms.Sk.Parveen, learned counsel representing Sri S.M.Subhan, learned that the cause in the Writ Petition does not Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 169 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION No.7366 of 2005 Dated : 25.04.2025 MP