Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44078 (CHH)

VIJAY KUMAR v. HIMANSHU GUPTA

CONT/1366/2024 · 2025-01-27

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4757 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1366 of 2024 1 - Vijay Kumar S/o Umendram Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Nariyara, Police Station Pamgarh, At Present District Janjgir-Champa, District Bilaspur, M.P. (Now Chhattisgarh) ... Applicant versus 1 - Himanshu Gupta Director General (Jail), Government Of Chhattisgarh, Sector 19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. (Contemnor) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant : Ms. Renu Kochar, Advocate. For Respondent : Ms. Natasha Khan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Y.S. Thakur, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order on Board 27/01/2025 1. Alleging that the respondent has not complied with the orders and directions issued by this court in W.P. (Cr.) No. 236 of 2024 dated 18.07.2024, the complainant is before this court in this contempt petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that order complained of dated 18.07.2024 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court in Writ Petition (Cr.) No. 236 of 2024 has been complied with and the Director General (Jail), Govt. of Chhattisgarh has forwarded the application filed by the applicant for granting him remission to the Government for remission. 3. Counsel for the respondent has also conceded the aforesaid fact and she has filed Annexure D-1 to demonstrate the aforesaid fact. 2 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 5. Since the application filed by the applicant for granting him remission has already been decided by the respondent and communication to this effect has been made by him to the Govt. of Chhattisgarh, therefore, I do not find any reason to proceed further in the matter initiating contempt against the respondent. 6. Accordingly, the contempt case is dropped. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Amit/- AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.01.31 17:27:46 +0530