IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36629 OF 2012 Between: K. Mohan, s/o Kannaiah, Aged about 58 years, Occ; Presently working as Senior Offset Printer, TTD Press, R/o KT. Road, Tirupati, Chittoor District ...PETITIONER AND 1. Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams Rep. by its Executive Officer Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2. The Manager, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Printing Press, Tirupati, Chittoor District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of^^the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one ih the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS (a) declaring the action of the respondents in proposing to retire the petitioner from service on attaining the age of 58 years instead of 60 yeare vide proceedings Roc.No.E5/8052/20ld dated 08.06.2011 as arbitrary and against the Provisions of Act 23 of 1984 which has been made applicable to the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam virtue of G.O. Ms. No. 1060 Revenue (Endts.lll) Department 24.01.1989; and (b) consequently direct the petitioner in service till such time he attains the by dated respondents to continue the age of 60 years which is the normal age of retirement for workman of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Printing Press with all consequential benefits. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012rWPMP. NO: 46504 OF 201:?} Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings Roc.No.E5/8052/2010 dated 08.06.2011 in so far as it relates to the petitioner to enable him to continue in service till such time he attains the age of 60 years, which would be the normal age of superannuation for workman of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam Printing Press. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SRINIVASA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: SRI A PRABHAKAR SARMA SC FOR TTD The Court made the following: ORDER in the APHC010051712012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3310] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 36629/2012 Between: \ K. Mohan, Chittoor Dist. ...PETITIONER AND E O Ttd Tirupathi Ano and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.K SRINIVASA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.A PRABHAKAR SARMA SC FOR TTD The Court made the following: ORDER: Tpday, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. K. Srinivasa Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A.Prabhakar Sarma, learned Standing Counsel for TTD, who appeared virtually through video conferencing for the respondents, conjointly submits that, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the respondents, therefore, no further orders and the same may be closed. are required to be passed for adjudication in this writ petition 2. Recording the above submission shall be no order as to costs. the Writ Petition is closed. There 3- As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VENU GOPAL RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //true copy// To, SECTION OFFICER One CC to Sri K Srinivasa 2. One CC to Sri AT 3. Three CD Copies Prasad Advocate [OPUC] Prabhakar Sarnia, SC for TTD Advocate [OPUCJ TF HIGH COURT DATED:21/03/2025 \ \ ORDER WP.No.36629 of 2012 5 11 g ^ , Current Section ^ CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS