Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44073 (KAR)

SHAIKH MOHAMMAD HANIF BEPARI v. SMT. SHUBHA B

CCC/100053/2025 · 2025-04-08

C M Poonacha, S G Pandit

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6240-DB CCC No. 100053 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE NO.100053 OF 2025 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: SHAIKH MOHAMMAD HANIF BEPARI S/O. SHAIKH IBRAHIM BEPARI, AGE. 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O.253, DON-JOAO MERCES, NORTH GOA-403005, GOA STATE. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI S.H.YADAWAD, ADVOCATE.) AND: 1. SMT. SHUBHA B., AGE. MAJOR, OCC. THE COMMISSIONER CITY CORPORATION, BELAGAVI, SUBHASH NAGAR, BELAGAVI-590001. 2. MR. MEHABOOB S/O. MASTANA KALLOLLI, AGE. MAJOR, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. AT NO.3703/6, KANJAR GALLI, TAL. AND DIST. BELAGAVI. 3. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIKAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560001. …ACCUSED (BY SRI M.M.KHANNUR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR A3; BY SRI BHUSHAN KULKARNI, ADVOCATE FOR A1; A2 – PETITION IS DISMISSED.) Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6240-DB CCC No. 100053 of 2025 THIS CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, READ WITH ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE CONTEMNOR/ ACCUSED NO.1 FOR WILLFULLY NOT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS COURT IN W.P.NO.100267/2023 DATED 25.06.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND ETC.,. THIS CONTEMPT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER IS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Learned counsel for the complainant Sri S.H.Yadawad, as well as the learned counsel for respondent No.1/accused Sri Bhushan Kulkarni submit that the order is complied and the contempt petition would no more survive for consideration. 2. The submission of the learned counsels is placed on record. The further proceedings in the contempt petition are dropped. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE MRK/ CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35