P V NARAIAH v. PRL.SECRETARY ( TECHNICAL EDUCATION) AND 4 OTHERS
WP/45647/2016 · 2025-04-24
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44068 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 44068 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
% V p [ 3504 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45647 OF 2016 Between: P. V. Naraiah, S/o P.Venkata Subbiah, aged about 58 years, R/o 1/422- 7, Maruthi Nagar, Opp Rajiv Park, Kadapah. Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Technical Education, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District-522503. Andhra Pradesh
2. Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, B.R.K.R.Bhavan, Hyderabad-500063.
3. Member Secretary, Office of the Admissions and Fee Regulatory Committee, HACA Bhavan, Ground Floor, Hyderabad-500004.
4. A.P.State Council of Higher Education, Rep by its Secretary Vishweswariah Bhawan, Khairatabad, Hyderabad-500004
5. K.S.RM College of Engineering, Kadapa-516003 ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of the respondents in extending the benefit of age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years par with the other state government employees, university non teaching staff and the aided colleges non teaching staff as discriminatory, illegal, irrational and illogical. one on I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016fWPMP. NO: 56264 OF 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to extend the benefit of of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years to the petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. VARUN BYREDDY age Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) Counsel for the Respondents: C PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following:
1 APHC010730912016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 45647/2016 Between: ...PETITIONER P.V.Naraiah AND PrI Secretary Technical Education And 4 Others and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VARUN BYREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HIGHEREDUCATION(AP) 2.0 PRAKASH REDDY The Court made the following:
1 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION No.45647 OF 2016
ORDER: This instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking the following main prayer:-
“to issue a Writ,
Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in extending the benefit of age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years on par with the other state government employees, university non teaching staff and the aided colleges non teaching staff as discriminatory, illegal, irrational and illogical and pass such other orders
" At the time of admission of the lis on 27.12.2016, this Court
2. Today, the learned Assistant not granted any interim orders. Government Pleader for Education reported that the writ petitioner As such, no cause P.V.Naraiah, superannuated on 31.12.2016. survives in the present writ petition for further adjudication. Taking note of the above submission made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 and also in
3. view of the fact that the said date of retirement of the petitioner i.e.
2 31.12.2016 is not disputed by the etamed this Court is inclined to close survives for adjudication in this lis.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be as to costs. counsel for the petitioner the writ petition as there is no cause no order Pending miscellaneous applications if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- U.SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// OFFICER SECT! To,
1. Oneccto SRI. VARUN BYREDDY Advocate
2. Two CCs to GP FOR I Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI. C PRAKASH
4. Three CD Copies [OPUC] higher education (AP) .High Court Of REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
V/ Jtl fl 4* HIGH COURT DATED:25/04/2025
ORDER WP.No.45647 of 2016 THE WRIT PETITION IS CLOSED WITHOUT COSTS