Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 44061 (RAJ)

GIRIRAJ VAISHNAV S/O MOHAN DAS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/16909/2025 · 2025-11-06

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44608] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16909/2025 Giriraj Vaishnav S/o Mohan Das, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Devenimadiya, Deo Neemri, Jatwara, Kota At Present Working As Cook In Govt. Ambedkar Hostel Khatoli, District Kota ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Department Of Social Justice And Empowerment, Govt. Of Rajasthan, 22 Godown, Jaipur 3. Assistant Director, Department Social Justice And Empowerment, Kota ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 06/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “By an appropriate writ, order or direction direct the respondents; to grant benefits minimum pay scale of Cook/Class-IV employee to the petitioner from the date of her initially appointment with all consequential benefits and also pay arrears thereof with interest.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon order dated 24.02.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4728/2025 titled as Ravi Gurjar Vs. State of [2025:RJ-JP:44608] (2 of 2) [CW-16909/2025] Rajasthan submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order and liberty be given to file a representation to the respondents raising all the grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation in light of ration laid down in case of Anokh Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan SB CWP No.372/2013. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E- mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /42