[2025:RJ-JP:49440] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18234/2025 Shreya Parmar D/o Pritam Singh Parmar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Ward No. 6, Near Ganesh Mandir, Vpo Arthuna, Tehsil Arthuna, District Banswara, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary, Agriculture Management Institute Building, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Nalin G. Narain with Mr. Manish Bhardwaj Mr. Gopal Krishna Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your Lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition with costs and further be pleased to direct the respondents to the following effect: i) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be directed to accept online/offline application form for the post of Teacher Gr. III Level I in the Elementary Education Department by [2025:RJ-JP:49440] (2 of 3) [CW-18234/2025] relaxing her in possessing the requisite qualification timely. ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the Condition No. 6.4 of the Advertisement dated 06.11.2025, which mandates the possession of qualification by the last date of application for the Elementary Education Department posts may kindly be quashed and set aside. iii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby the respondents be further directed to consider the educational qualification for the post of Teacher Gr. III Level I in the Elementary Education Department at the time of written examination similar to the post advertised for Sanskrit Education Department vide same adveritment. iv) Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioner..” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and [2025:RJ-JP:49440] (3 of 3) [CW-18234/2025] speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /411